Test Conclusions
Objective:
1.When comparing paint types of similar mass and velocity, does a First Strike paint projectile impact the target with a similar or different force when compared to spherical paint? A: VERY SIMILAR
2.Does the “base” or “skirt” of the FSR modify the impact force?
A: NO
3.Based on measured impact forces, determine if a recommendation could be made to change the definition of a paintball to include non-spherical projectiles. A: YES
Recommendation
•Amend the definition of a paintball in F1979 to include non-sphericalpaint projectiles.
•Doing so will provide a path for manufacturers to be able to test to ASTM standard where such a path does not exist today.
•Suggest that the language used simply address the question of shape leaving all other elements the same. This will address all manufacturers products, present and future, not only the FSR.
•We suggest that non-spherical projectiles be further defined, for purposes of clarity, to be limited to a shape defined as an “elliptical ogive” which describes a form that has a rounded nose that is not pointed.
•In amending the definition to include non-spherical paint projectiles this would mean that any non-spherical projectile will still need to pass all other current ASTM standard tests as currently defined in F1979.
•Since the data indicates that impact force of the non spherical “First Strike” are equal, or interchangeable, with mainstream spherical paintball, we see no reason at this time to modify any other ASTM standard testing protocols.
UPDATE: The ASTM has ordered further testing of projectiles at a distance, MFM will be publishing that information as well. The testing will take place in the month of August.