Louisville Medicine Volume 66, Issue 12 | Page 37

DOCTORS' Lounge SPEAK YOUR MIND If you would like to respond to an article in this issue, please submit an article or letter to the editor. Contributions may be sent to [email protected] or may be submitted online at www.glms.org. The GLMS Editorial Board reserves the right to choose what will be published. Please note that the views expressed in Doctors’ Lounge or any other article in this publication are not those of the Greater Louisville Medical Society or Louisville Medicine. PLANT or Die Mary G. Barry, MD Louisville Medicine Editor [email protected] W hen I read about antibi- otic resistance and the ongoing emergence of new bacterial and fungal enemies, I have nightmares involving running out of bleach. These started when Ebola re-emerged in the Congo last year and gained new life when I read Matt Richtel and Andrew Jacobs’ re- porting in the April 6 th The New York Times article, “Revenge of the Bacteria: Why We’re Losing the War.” I envision armed gangs at Big Lots holding the driver hostage as they offload the semi into armored white vans. The Clorox factories have Star Wars heat shields and robot guards in tanks and drones. In my dreams, I have only an empty sponge to confront a wall of mold. It’s ugly and it grows as I watch, until I wake up yelling. center for lung and heart problems, had acquired over three months this markedly resistant fungus, the administrators finally called the CDC. Seventy-two people end- ed up infected, although no deaths were directly attributed to invasive candidemia. This resistant Candida has affected those with immune systems weakened by chemo- therapy and immune suppressive therapy for transplants, who have often received multiple courses of antibiotics. Case fatality rates from countries around the world have ranged from over 30% to more than 50%. The accuracy of these figures has been ques- tioned, since identifying the exact cause of death in a weakened patient with infections and multi-organ dysfunction is difficult. dia, C. auris was isolated in 19/27 intensive care units in a 2017 study. Whole-genome sequencing showed that the United States isolates indicated links to both the South Asian and South American groups. Isolates of this organism from various countries have been submitted for genetic analysis. A late 2017 article in the American The problem with translating whole genome sequencing into clinical medicine is in identifying the exact organism. As a rule, hospital labs use other methods, and many of these organisms can be misidenti- fied and therefore treated, wrongly. Treating the wrong isolate of Candida has potentially disastrous results. Patients so treated expose the organism in-vivo to drugs reserved for invasive candidemia, thus fostering the growth of resistance while failing to help the patient. Dr. Smith et al. reanalyzed multiple samples and found a case from 1996 and another from 2008, but the first acknowledged identification was from the In reality, we cannot inject intravenous bleach against one of the newest and most fearsome pathogens, Candida auris. I first learned of it a couple of years ago in as- sociation with an outbreak in the Royal Brompton Hospital in Chelsea, London. After at least 50 people in this hospital, a Society for Microbiology Journal (A.J. Smith and multiple authors) noted the fungus has shown nearly simultaneous emergence of separate clades (genetic varieties) in dif- ferent parts of the world. Different clonal strains of this have different patterns of sus- ceptibility to antifungal medicines. In In- ear of a Japanese woman in 2009, thus the “auris.” Initially, the key ingredient in proper identification is having the correct spectral data loaded into the fungus-identifying ap- paratus, called the “Maldi-TOF MS” mass spectrometer database. Rapid identification (continued on page 36) MAY 2019 35