Legacy Spring 2013 | Page 17

PHOTOS : PATRICK O ’ LEARY

I f your dental fillings , crowns , and implants have lasted a while , you can thank ART . Chewing involves some of the human body ’ s most complex motions , and ART , the artificial mouth at the University of Minnesota School of Dentistry , can perform a year ’ s worth of chewing — 300,000 cycles — in just a day or two .

By reproducing the motions and forces at play in human chewing , ART is invaluable for testing the performance of dental materials and guiding their development . It chews with real teeth or teeth made of any material an investigator wants to test , complete with a stream of water or artificial saliva .
Robotic Mouth and More First developed in 1983 , ART — now in its fifth generation — has become the gold standard for testing dental materials without human volunteers .
“ Our discoveries are in the technology used to evaluate materials ,” says Ralph DeLong , professor and interim chair of the Department of Restorative Sciences , who built the original apparatus with an engineer from MTS Systems Corp ., a testing and sensor technology company in Eden Prairie , Minnesota . “ ART-1 was the first artificial oral environment that chews effectively , using physiological parameters such as the force applied , where it ’ s applied , and what happens to teeth when you chew .” ART-1 won the coveted IR-100 Award for 1983 , placing it in the top 100 inventions of that year . Among the many other notable advancements by DeLong and his colleagues :
• DeLong and others developed a system to digitally map the 3-D profile of a tooth or a sample of dental material . A computer compares profiles before and after a chewing test to calculate the amount of wear . The number of chews that produce a given amount of wear indicates how well the test material will hold up in a real mouth .
• DeLong ’ s colleague Maria Pintado pioneered a tooth-brushing machine . She outfitted toothbrushes to measure
the motions and forces produced when many volunteers brushed , then programmed the machine to duplicate the various patterns and see what worked best . The results were used in toothbrush design .
• Using a micro CT scanner , researchers developed a technique to measure leakage of “ bugs ” into bonding materials that have formed gaps with the tooth structure after chewing . When a tooth with a compromised restorative material is placed in a silver nitrate solution , the silver nitrate seeps into any gaps and will show up on the scanner .
Center of Innovation In 1991 , Professor William Douglas , along with scientists from 3M , created the first University-industrial center , dedicated to putting their technologies to work in dental product development .
Called the Minnesota Dental Research Center for Biomaterials and Biomechanics ( MDRCBB ), the center has just won another major prize : a William J . Gies Award for Vision , Innovation , and Achievement — the Oscar of dental education — given by the American Dental Education Association Gies Foundation . The center won in the category of “ outstanding vision — public or private partner ,” a tribute to its history of bringing farsighted research to fruition .
The School of Dentistry now has two Gies Awards . The first , given in 2010 , came in the “ outstanding vision — academic dental institution ” category .
The center continues to evolve under Alex Fok , its director since 2007 , who has added both technical capacity and industrial partners . In addition to founding partner 3M ( whose dental manufacturing division is now 3M ESPE ), supporters include General Mills , orthodontics maker Ormco , and Spain-based dental implant company Mozo Grau .
“ The strength of the center is its ability to simulate oral challenges in the laboratory ,” says Fok . This provides “ a way for companies to identify and respond to challenges before they reach the expensive and time-consuming clinical trial phase .”
DeLong and colleagues are now designing the ART-5 machine , which
In the ART-1 artificial mouth , streams of lubricant are trained on the point of contact between chewing surfaces .
will chew real food as realistically as possible — responding , for example , to texture . “ We don ’ t know how people chew food ,” DeLong says . “ We do know there are pressure sensors in periodontal tissue , and we speculate that it gives early information about how much [ chewing ] force is necessary .”
The goal is to improve dental implants , small metal cylinders used as anchors for a new tooth . Though tough , they lack the cushioning of periodontal tissue . DeLong and his colleagues will use ART-5 to determine the best occlusion , or meshing of teeth , to minimize stress on teeth with implants . They expect to have it up and running by the end of this year .
If it seems no test of dental materials or practices is beyond MDRCBB , you ’ re probably right .
“ If you wanted to test dental floss , we ’ d figure it out ,” DeLong says .
Deane Morrison is a science writer and editor in the U of M ’ s University Relations department .

r To see ART-1 in action , visit giving . umn . edu

15