Leadership magazine Nov/Dec 2017 V47 No. 2 | Page 39

Hispanic teachers can be as ill-prepared for inner-city classrooms as middle-class Whites.” The selection of beneficial role models has to be based not only on their ethnicity, but by their qualifications and capacity to per- form their teaching and administrative du- ties with efficiency and dedication. This as- pect leads us to think that the question is no longer how to recruit minority educational leaders but how we prepare high quality ed- ucators with the basic skills, knowledge and sensitivity for success. As we can derive from the available re- search performed on the minority presence in American education, the reasons for the lack of non-White educators rely on many variables. Some of these reasons include the status of the current education pipeline – fewer minority graduates, fewer minority teachers and consequently fewer minor- ity administrators; discrimination based on cultural and linguistic attributes; the lack of decisional power in middle management; the lack of effective training in teacher and administration preparation programs; and the resistance to change by the “old order.” Many researchers have concluded that in order to improve the student condition, we have to improve our teacher and adminis- trator training programs. According to the research, these programs have to establish successful mentoring procedures and cre- ate in-service experiences that will help our current and future educational leaders with the development of empathy and sen- sibility to the historic and current role of race in our society. Some knowledge that could help the pro- gressive educator and deserves inclusion in any successful training would be: • Public policy information, including local officials, legal and legislative proce- dures. • Information about the complete educa- tional structure, including accreditation of preparation programs, certification of pro- fessionals in education, effect of labor unions and community members in the educational process, and current funding of programs. • In-service practice on effective and non- effective scenarios. • Basic finance and fundraising strategies. • Public relations and marketing. • Community, city, state, national and international connection and collaboration. • Mentoring of students, parents and school staff into pedagogical careers. • Effective strategies for empathy develop- ment in culture and community needs. • Evaluation and curriculum development that includes all aspects listed above and use of technology. There are many programs around the na- tion that provide such training, but they are still a minority. While training initiatives may continue to have resistance by the older rule, the seed is being planted. If we con- tinue to apply these inclusive concepts as an additive approach to the existing curricula at the training and in-service levels, a sig- nificant change could take place in the near future. The current education situation of our na- tional minority populations, which will be our majority of students and future leaders in a few years, cannot be ignored by education stakeholders. The results of this negligence November | December 2017 39