Leadership magazine May/June 2017 V46 No. 5 | Page 9

ing because we are building on the critical components they have established as the governing body for the school district. In addition, annually, when the goals of the superintendent are constructed, they are built to support the LCAP goals. This same approach is used for the goals of cabi- net and the principals. Engaging stakeholders in the change process is vital for collaboration and sus- tainable change. The LCAP and its asso- ciated stakeholder engagement has proven valuable in bringing about new innovations and the resulting change within our orga- nization. Listening to the many different perspectives of various stakeholder groups allows us to improve our system, while pro- viding opportunities to receive feedback from all groups within the organization. In order to help people be more accept- ing of innovation, we first define our cur- rent reality in relation to the new idea and also conduct research on the best practices related to the topic. This approach helps us identify the gaps in our current services and gain the relative advantage by provid- ing evidence of what the innovation could become. When new ideas are initiated by stake- holder groups, they are more likely to align with the values of the community and the organization, which minimizes the road- blocks throughout the change process. We have experienced that new ideas not aligned with our organizational or com- munity values tend to lose momentum as they progress through stakeholder groups. Conversely, when meaningful change is brought forth, it tends to gain momentum and urgency as it makes its way through various groups that view it as beneficial. This is a strong signal to us that the change is compatible to our values. Perhaps one of the strongest methods of collaborative goal setting is the LCAP. In Romoland, we have embraced the con- cept of working with our stakeholders to make decisions for our school district. We use our real-time data and educational research in order to make informed deci- sions. We have a working group of 35-40 people who engage in collaborative work- shops focused on implementing services #LeadershipMatters When meaningful change is brought forth, it tends to gain momentum and urgency as it makes its way through various groups that view it as beneficial. we believe are needed to achieve the re- sults we desire. Our workshops are organized by topic, so our stakeholders only need to consider one objective at a time. We have three goals in our LCAP that serve as the foundation for any initiative that is implemented or dollar that is spent. Our stakeholders have determined that these are the most critical areas of focus; therefore we are commit- ted to ensuring our actions and funds are aligned with these goals. Aligning expectations “District Leadership that Works,” clearly supports the idea that districts and schools that are tightly coupled experience in- creased results as compared to those that are loosely coupled. This premise led us on our journey to align the expectations of our instructional supports and create systems that reinforce non-negotiable goals for teaching and learning. The district set the expectation that our site administrators position themselves as instructional leaders on their campus. This did not mean they had to have all of the answers about effective pedagogy or be the best teacher at their site. What it did mean is that we expected them to spend the bulk of their time engaging in conversations about teaching and learning with staff, ob- serving classrooms, and providing mean- ingful feedback to teachers. We set the expectation that principals visit every classroom every week, at mini- mum. The basic idea behind this expecta- tion is to lead by example and learn by ex- ample. We also saw this as an opportunity to align our daily actions with the things we value most: teaching and learning. We want our principals to have a solid understanding of how their teachers teach, what kinds of strategies are utilized, and if there is appropriate focus on student mas- tery of the desired learning objectives. The significant time spent in the classrooms al- lows principals to see first-hand the quality May | June 2017 9