R. Maritz et al.
3. Haigh R, Tennant A, Biering-Sorensen F, Grimby G, Ma-
rincek C, Phillips S, et al. The use of outcome measures
in physical medicine and rehabilitation within Europe. J
Rehabil Med 2001; 33: 273–278.
4. Keith RA, Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Sherwin FS. The Fun-
ctional Independence Measure: a new tool for rehabilita-
tion. Adv Clin Rehabil 1987; 1: 6–18.
5. Fiedler RC, Granger CV. The Functional Independence
Measure: a measurement of disability and medical reha-
bilitation. In: Chino N. MJL, editor. Functional evaluation of
stroke patients. Tokyo: Springer-Verlag; 1996, p. 75–92.
6. Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation. The
FIM(R) instrument: its background structure and useful-
ness. Buffalo: UDSMR; 2012 [cited 2018 Jul 19]. Available
from: https://www.udsmr.org/Documents/The_FIM_In-
strument_Background_Structure_and_Usefulness.pdf.
7. ANQ Nationaler Verein für Qualitätsentwicklung in Spitälern
und Kliniken. Review Information: Rehabilitation. 2018
[cited 2018 Jul 19]. Available from: https://www.anq.ch/
en/departments/rehabilitation/.
8. Model System Knowledge Translation Center. The Spinal
Cord Injury Model System (SCIMS)-SCIMS PowerPoint
presentation. 2013 [cited 2018 May 25]. Available from:
http://www.msktc.org/About-Model-Systems#SCI.
9. Model System Knowledge Translation Center. The Trau-
matic Brain Injury Model Systems-TBIMS PowerPoint
Presentation. 2017 [cited 2018 May 25]. Available from:
http://www.msktc.org/tbi.
10. Canadian Institute for Health Information. National Reha-
bilitation Reporting System-Privacy Impact Assessment.
2015 [cited 2018 Nov 05]. Available from: https://www.
cihi.ca/en/nrs_pia_en.pdf.
11. Australasian Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre. The FIM™ in-
strument in Australia. [cited 2018 Nov 05]. Available from:
https://ahsri.uow.edu.au/aroc/whatisfim/index.html.
12. Carter GM, Relies DA, Ridgeway GK, Rimes CM. Measuring
functioning for Medicare inpatient rehabilitation payment.
Health Care Financ Rev 2003; 24: 25–44.
13. Andrich D. Rating scales and Rasch measurement. Expert
Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2011; 11: 571–585.
14. Ehlan A, Kucukdeveci A, Tennant A. The Rasch measure-
ment model. In: F. F, editor. Research issues in physical
& rehabilitation medicine. Pava: Maugeri Foundation;
2010, p. 89–102.
15. Tennant A, Conaghan PG. The Rasch measurement model
in rheumatology: what is it and why use it? When should
it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch
paper? Arthritis Rheum 2007; 57: 1358–1362.
16. Linacre JM, Heinemann AW, Wright BD, Granger CV, Ha-
milton BB. The structure and stability of the Functional
Independence Measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;
75: 127–132.
17. Lundgren Nilsson A, Tennant A. Past and present issues
in Rasch analysis: the Functional Independence Measure
(FIM) revisited. J Rehabil Med 2011; 43: 884–891.
18. Cantagallo A, Carli S, Simone A, Tesio L. MINDFIM: a
measure of disability in high-functioning traumatic brain
injury outpatients. Brain Inj 2006; 20: 913–925.
19. Medvedev ON, Turner-Stokes L, Ashford S, Siegert RJ.
Rasch analysis of the UK Functional Assessment Measure
in patients with complex disability after stroke. J Rehabil
Med 2018; 50: 420–428.
20. Wilson M. Detecting and interpreting local item dependence
using a family of Rasch models Appl Psychol Meas 1988;
12: 353–364.
21. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical
computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Compu-
200
www.medicaljournals.se/jrm
ting; 2018 [cited 2018 Nov 05]. Available from: https://
www.R-project.org/.
22. Smith AB, Rush R, Fallowfield LJ, Velikova G, Sharpe M.
Rasch fit statistics and sample size considerations for
polytomous data. BMC Med Res Methodol 2008; 8: 33.
23. Linacre JM. Sample size and item calibration (or person
measure) stability. Arch Rasch Meas SIG; 1994 [cited
2018 Nov 05]. Available from: https://www.rasch.org/
rmt/rmt74m.htm.
24. Hagell P, Westergren A. Sample size and statistical con-
clusions from test of fit to the Rasch model accodring to
the Rasch Unidimensional Measurement Model (RUMM)
program in health outcome measurement. J Appl Meas
2016; 17: 416–431.
25. Mallinson T. Rasch analysis of repeated measures. Rasch
Meas Trans 2011; 251: 1317.
26. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 14. College
Station, Texas: StataCor LP; 2015 [cited 2018 Nov 05].
Available from: http://www.stata.com.
27. Andrich D, Sheridan B, Luo G. RUMM2030 Version 5.4 for
Windows. Rumm Laboratory Pty Ltd; 2012 [cited 2018
Nov 05]. Available from: http://www.rummlab.com.au/.
28. Masters GN. A Rasch model for partial credit scoring.
Psychometrika 1982; 47: 149–174.
29. Andrich D. Components of variance of scales with a bifactor
subscale structure from two calculations of alpha. Educ
Meas 2016; 35: 25–30.
30. Wainer H, Kiely G. Item clusters and computer adap-
tive testing: a case for testlets. J Educ Meas 1987; 24:
185–202.
31. Tuerlinckx F, De Boeck P. The effect of ignoring item in-
teractions on the estimated discrimination parameters in
item response theory. Psychol Methods 2001; 6: 181–195.
32. Christensen KB, Makransky G, Horton M. Critical values for
Yen’s Q3: identification of local dependence in the Rasch
model using residual correlations. Appl Psychol Meas
2017; 41: 178–194.
33. Andrich D, Hagquist C. Real and artificial differential item
functioning in polytomous items. Educ Psychol Meas 2015;
75: 185–207.
34. Morris SB, DeShon RP. Combining effect size estimates in
meta-analysis with repeated measures and independent-
groups designs. Psychol Methods 2002; 7: 105–125.
35. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral
sciences. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
36. Pretz CR, Kean J, Heinemann AW, Kozlowski AJ, Bode RK,
Gebhardt E. A multidimensional Rasch analysis of the
Functional Independence Measure based on the National
Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabi-
litation Research Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems
National Database. J Neurotrauma 2016; 33: 1358–1362.
37. Tesio L, Valsecchi MR, Sala M, Guzzon P, Battaglia MA.
Level of activity in profound/severe mental retardation
(LAPMER): a Rasch-derived scale of disability. J Appl Meas
2002; 3: 50–84.
38. Model System Knowledge Translation Center. Burn injury
resources. 2018 [cited 2018 Jul 16]. Available from:
https://msktc.org/burn/burn-resources.
39. World Health Organization. World report on ageing and
health Geneva, Switzerland: 2015.
40. Hammond A, Tennant A, Tyson SF, Nordenskiold U, Haw-
kins R, Prior Y. The reliability and validity of the English
version of the Evaluation of Daily Activity Questionnaire
for people with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology 2015;
54: 1605–1615.
41. Prodinger B, Tennant A, Stucki G. Standardized reporting
of functioning information on ICF-based common metrics.
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2018; 54: 110–117.