Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 51-3 | Page 43

Predictors of chronic pain 189 Table IV. Baseline predictors (T0) for pain sensitivity (Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ)) at 2-year follow-up (T1) Multivariable 1 Multivariable 2 (N=9,880; 13.3% missing data) * (N=8,873; 22.1% missing data) * Univariable Baseline predictors Estimate (B) 95% CI p-value Estimate (B) 95% CI Pain intensity 0.16 0.14, 0.18 < 0.001 Pain spreading a Pain sensitivity Age, years 0.21 0.72 0.05 0.19, 0.24 < 0.001 0.70, 0.73 < 0.001 0.02, 0.07 < 0.001 – – –0.03 – – –0.07, 0.16 0.10, 0.21 < 0.001 0.11 0.06, 0.05 0.02, 0.08 < 0.001 0.01 –0.04, –0.17 –0.21, –0.14 < 0.001 –0.14 0.19 0.14, 0.27 < 0.001 0.03 0.79 0.69, 0.89 < 0.001 0.64 0.53, 0.52 –0.11 0.32, 0.72 < 0.001 –0.13,  –0.08 < 0.001 – –0.03 Sex (female/male b ) Marital status (married/other b ) Educational level (university/other b ) Employment (unemployed/employed b ) Country of birth (abroad/Sweden b ) Citizenship (other/Sweden b ) Household income, Euros per year b Traumatic injuries (yes/no ) – – 0.02 0.72 0.03 0.074 –0.03, 0.02 p-value 0.089 –0.02, 0.06 0.391 0.69, 0.74 < 0.001 –0.04, 0.09 0.420 0.17 < 0.001 0.02 –0.03, 0.06 0.484 0.05 0.03 –0.02, 0.08 0.310 –0.18,  –0.10 < 0.001 –0.01 –0.06, 0.04 0.714 –0.03, –0.03, 0.13 0.246 0.10 0.807 0.330 0.05 0.75 < 0.001 – –0.05, 0.01 0.28 – 0.070 – –0.01 – – 0.16, 0.40 < 0.001 – –0.04, 0.02 – 0.07, 0.22 < 0.001 –0.02 Pulmonary disorders (yes/no b ) 0.18 0.12, 0.4 < 0.001 0.03 –0.04, 0.11 0.373 –0.02 –0.09, 0.06 0.665 0.16 0.07, 0.25 < 0.001 –0.03 –0.12, 0.07 0.654 –0.03 –0.12, 0.07 0.662 Disorders of the CNS (yes/no b ) 0.27 0.20, 0.35 < 0.001 0.13 0.05, 0.21 0.001 0.03 –0.06, 0.11 0.506 0.20 0.13, 0.26 < 0.001 0.07 –0.01, 0.14 0.062 –0.01 –0.08, 0.07 0.936 0.35 0.22, 0.47 < 0.001 0.16 0.02, 0.30 0.025 –0.06 –0.19, 0.08 0.419 0.10 0.02, 0.18 0.014 0.04 –0.05, 0.13 0.358 0.02 –0.08, 0.11 0.724 –0.07, 0.26 0.188 0.17 –0.01, 0.34 0.067 Skin diseases (yes/no b ) Tumours/cancer (yes/no b ) – – 0.486 0.14 Urogenital disorders (yes/no b ) 0.217 –0.02 – Gastrointestinal disorders (yes/no b ) 0.15 0.03 – 0.24, 0.37 < 0.001 Cardiovascular disorders (yes/no b ) –0.03, p-value Estimate (B) 95% CI – 0.31 Rheumatoid arthritis/osteoarthritis (yes/no b ) 0.06 – –0.09, 0.05 – 0.518 0.24 0.09, 0.38 0.002 0.09 Depression (yes/no b ) 0.36 0.27, 0.45 < 0.001 0.25 0.15, 0.35 < 0.001 0.13 0.03, 0.22 0.014 0.41 0.32, 0.48 < 0.001 0.25 0.16, 0.33 < 0.001 –0.02 –0.12, 0.08 0.662 Anxiety (yes/no ) 0.41 0.34, 0.49 < 0.001 – – Metabolic disorders (yes/no b ) b – – – – *N = number of complete cases included in the models out of a total of 11,386 respondents. a Baseline spread of pain was entered to the models as covariate with 5 levels 0 = no pain, 1 = local pain, 2 = Regional Pain-Medium, 3 = Regional Pain-Heavy, and 4 = widespread pain. b Reference category. B: unstandardized regression coefficient; CI: Wald confidence interval; CNS: central nervous system. Multivariable 1: all baseline variables together in 1 model without baseline pain dimensions; Multivariable 2: all baseline variables from multivariable model 1, including baseline pain dimensions. Significant differences in bold. pain intensity has been shown to predict increased pain intensity (31, 42) and to predict CP (single characte- ristics of pain not presented) (43). Spread of pain was associated with CP (single characteristics of pain not presented) at follow-up (44, 45) and anatomical spread of pain at follow-up (46, 47). In non-longitudinal stu- dies, spread of pain has been found to be significantly correlated with pain intensity (48, 49). In a systematic review, both pain spread and intensity were considered prognostic factors for CP (single pain characteristics not presented) (50). The multivariable models 2 in the current study provides a comprehensive overview on the impact of 3 characteristics of pain (intensity, spread and sensitivity) on the burden of pain over time. Based on the results of the present study and the above studies, future longitudinal studies should investigate risk factors for several characteristics of pain and in- clude these characteristics of pain at baseline in order to predict accurately how pain develops. Other longitudinal studies that tried to detect signi- ficant predictors in relation to CP thus restricted their analysis mostly to 1 characteristic of pain or to a general label of pain. As argued in the introduction, such a uni- dimensional approach is from a clinical point of view a too simplistic description of pain per se. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first comprehensive attempt to ascertain predictors of different common clinical characteristics of CP in the light of the concept and perception of pain as a multifaceted phenomenon. The results of the current study highlight that the features of the predictors in the final models are only to a limited extent common for the 3 characteristics of pain investi- gated. Furthermore, this study suggests that CP, as most often defined and as defined in this study, constitutes a general indicator for several clinical characteristics of CP. It appears that characteristics of pain, such as intensity, anatomical spread, and sensitivity, only partly reflect similar underlying neurobiological mechanisms both in the cross-sectional and longitudinal perspec- tives. Hence, recent cross-sectional studies of muscle and plasma in patients with CP conditions have shown that pain intensity and pain sensitivity (i.e. pressure pain thresholds) are associated with different molecular mechanisms from a protein pattern perspective (51, 52). Moreover, the characteristics of pain investigated may be, at least partly, processed differently in the CNS and have different associations with other conditions, such as psychological symptoms. The current longitudinal results confirm the results of previous (mostly cross-sectional) studies, sugges- ting associations between sociodemographic factors and single characteristics of pain (1, 15, 16, 53–55) and that such factors are less predictive of short- to medium-term changes in pain. The present longitudinal study found being female to be a predictor for pain intensity (Table II, multivariable J Rehabil Med 51, 2019