Repetitive gait training early after stroke
of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: WHO; 2015.
33. Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T. Estimating the sample mean
and standard deviation from the sample size, median,
range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol
2014; 14: 135.
34. Harbour R, Miller J. A new system for grading recom-
mendations in evidence based guidelines. BMJ 2001;
323: 334–336.
35. Pohl M, Werner C, Holzgraefe M, Kroczek G, Mehrholz J,
Wingendorf I, et al. Repetitive locomotor training and
physiotherapy improve walking and basic activities of daily
living after stroke: a single-blind, randomized multicentre
trial (DEutsche GAngtrainerStudie, DEGAS). Clin Rehabil
2007; 21: 17–27.
36. Ada L, Dean CM, Morris ME, Simpson JM, Katrak P. Ran-
domized trial of treadmill walking with body weight support
to establish walking in subacute stroke: the MOBILISE
trial. Stroke 2010; 41: 1237–1242.
37. Dean CM, Ada L, Bampton J, Morris ME, Katrak PH, Potts
S. Treadmill walking with body weight support in subacute
non-ambulatory stroke improves walking capacity more
than overground walking: a randomised trial. J Physiother
2010; 56: 97–103.
38. Chang WH, Kim MS, Huh JP, Lee PK, Kim YH. Effects of
robot-assisted gait training on cardiopulmonary fitness in
subacute stroke patients: a randomized controlled study.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2012; 26: 318–324.
39. Tong RK, Ng MF, Li LS. Effectiveness of gait training
using an electromechanical gait trainer, with and without
functional electric stimulation, in subacute stroke: a ran-
domized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;
87: 1298–1304.
40. Chua J, Culpan J, Menon E. Efficacy of an electromecha-
nical gait trainer poststroke in Singapore: a randomized
controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2016; 97: 683–690.
41. Nilsson L, Carlsson J, Danielsson A, Fugl-Meyer A, Hell-
strom K, Kristensen L, et al. Walking training of patients
with hemiparesis at an early stage after stroke: a compa-
rison of walking training on a treadmill with body weight
support and walking training on the ground. Clin Rehabil
2001; 15: 515–527.
42. Ng MF, Tong RK, Li LS. A pilot study of randomized clinical
controlled trial of gait training in subacute stroke patients
with partial body-weight support electromechanical gait
trainer and functional electrical stimulation: six-month
follow-up. Stroke 2008; 39: 154–160.
43. Morone G, Bragoni M, Iosa M, De Angelis D, Venturiero
V, Coiro P, et al. Who may benefit from robotic-assisted
gait training? A randomized clinical trial in patients with
subacute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2011; 25:
636–644.
44. Morone G, Iosa M, Bragoni M, De Angelis D, Venturiero V,
Coiro P, et al. Who may have durable benefit from robotic
gait training? A 2-year follow-up randomized controlled
trial in patients with subacute stroke. Stroke 2012; 43:
1140–1142.
45. Schwartz I, Sajin A, Fisher I, Neeb M, Shochina M, Katz-
Leurer M, et al. The effectiveness of locomotor therapy
using robotic-assisted gait training in subacute stroke
patients: a randomized controlled trial. PM R 2009; 1:
516–523.
46. Ochi M, Wada F, Saeki S, Hachisuka K. Gait training in
subacute non-ambulatory stroke patients using a full
weight-bearing gait-assistance robot: a prospective,
randomized, open, blinded-endpoint trial. J Neurolog Sci
2015; 353: 130–136.
47. Franceschini M, Carda S, Agosti M, Antenucci R, Malgrati D,
Cisari C. Walking after stroke: what does treadmill training
with body weight support add to overground gait training
in patients early after stroke? A single-blind, randomized,
controlled trial. Stroke 2009; 40: 3079–3085.
48. Peurala SH, Airaksinen O, Huuskonen P, Jakala P, Juhako-
ski M, Sandell K, et al. Effects of intensive therapy using
87
gait trainer or floor walking exercises early after stroke.
J Rehabil Med 2009; 41: 166–173.
49. Han EY, Im SH, Kim BR, Seo MJ, Kim MO. Robot-assisted
gait training improves brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity
and peak aerobic capacity in subacute stroke patients with
totally dependent ambulation: randomized controlled trial.
Medicine 2016; 95: e5078.
50. Nudo RJ. Recovery after brain injury: mechanisms and
principles. Front Hum Neurosci 2013; 7: 887.
51. Remple MS, Bruneau RM, VandenBerg PM, Goertzen C,
Kleim JA. Sensitivity of cortical movement representations
to motor experience: evidence that skill learning but not
strength training induces cortical reorganization. Behav
Brain Res 2001; 123: 133–141.
52. Cha J, Heng C, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Roy RR, Edgerton VR,
De Leon RD. Locomotor ability in spinal rats is dependent
on the amount of activity imposed on the hindlimbs during
treadmill training. J Neurotrauma 2007; 24: 1000–1012.
53. Lohse KR, Lang CE, Boyd LA. Is more better? Using me-
tadata to explore dose-response relationships in stroke
rehabilitation. Stroke 2014; 45: 2053–2058.
54. Bernhardt J, Dewey H, Thrift A, Donnan G. Inactive and
alone: physical activity within the first 14 days of acute
stroke unit care. Stroke 2004; 35: 1005–1009.
55. Astrand A, Saxin C, Sjoholm A, Skarin M, Linden T, Stoker
A, et al. Poststroke physical activity levels no higher in
rehabilitation than in the acute hospital. J Stroke Cere-
brovasc Dis 2016; 25: 938–945.
56. Rand D, Eng JJ. Disparity between functional recovery
and daily use of the upper and lower extremities during
subacute stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair
2012; 26: 76–84.
57. Morone G, Paolucci S, Cherubini A, De Angelis D, Venturiero
V, Coiro P, et al. Robot-assisted gait training for stroke
patients: current state of the art and perspectives of
robotics. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2017; 13: 1303–1311.
58. Moore JL, Roth EJ, Killian C, Hornby TG. Locomotor train-
ing improves daily stepping activity and gait efficiency in
individuals poststroke who have reached a “plateau” in
recovery. Stroke 2010; 41: 129–135.
59. Kitago T, Krakauer JW. Motor learning principles for neu-
rorehabilitation. Handb Clin Neurol 2013; 110: 93–103.
60. Patel AT, Duncan PW, Lai SM, Studenski S. The relation
between impairments and functional outcomes poststroke.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81: 1357–1363.
61. Levin MF, Kleim JA, Wolf SL. What do motor “recovery”
and “compensation” mean in patients following stroke?
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009; 23: 313–319.
62. Bernhardt J, Hayward KS, Kwakkel G, Ward NS, Wolf SL,
Borschmann K, et al. Agreed definitions and a shared vi-
sion for new standards in stroke recovery research: The
Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable Taskforce.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2017; 31: 793–799.
63. Buma F, Kwakkel G, Ramsey N. Understanding upper limb
recovery after stroke. Restorative Neurol Neurosci 2013;
31: 707–722.
64. Kwakkel G, Lannin NA, Borschmann K, English C, Ali M,
Churilov L, et al. Standardized measurement of sensorimo-
tor recovery in stroke trials: consensus-based core recom-
mendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation
Roundtable. Int J Stroke 2017; 12: 451–461.
65. van Asseldonk EH, Buurke JH, Bloem BR, Renzenbrink GJ,
Nene AV, van der Helm FC, et al. Disentangling the con-
tribution of the paretic and non-paretic ankle to balance
control in stroke patients. Exp Neurol 2006; 201: 441–451.
66. de Haart M, Geurts AC, Huidekoper SC, Fasotti L, van
Limbeek J. Recovery of standing balance in postacute
stroke patients: a rehabilitation cohort study. Arch Phys
Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 886–895.
67. Roerdink M, Geurts AC, de Haart M, Beek PJ. On the
relative contribution of the paretic leg to the control of
posture after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009;
23: 267–274.
J Rehabil Med 51, 2019