Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 51-1CompleteIssue | Page 62
Reliability of spasticity assessment
dystonia. A more recently published definition of
spasticity encompasses all positive features of the
UMNS, including spasticity, hypertonia, tendon re-
flexes, dystonia, clonus and spasms under a single
umbrella term (11). While this definition may provide
a more holistic overview of the UMNS, there are as-
sociated challenges in developing an assessment tool
that addresses each component of the UMNS. Due to
the high prevalence of velocity-dependent spasticity
and the profound impact it has on functional outcomes
following neurological injury (3–6, 9), it is important
that the clinical tools used to assess spasticity are both
valid and reliable (11, 13, 14).
Conclusion
There was a large degree of inter- and intra-rater varia-
bility in testing velocity when using the MTS to assess
for lower limb spasticity. The inter-rater variability was
approximately double the intra-rater variability across
all 5 muscle groups and the largest variability existed
at the ankle joint (gastrocnemius and soleus). Joint
start angle, end angle and total ROM demonstrated
less variability than testing velocity.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This project was supported by funding obtained from the Austra-
lian Physiotherapy Research Foundation Seeding Grant, Royal
Automobile Club of Victoria Sir Edmund Herring Memorial
Scholarship, and the Epworth Research Institute.
REFERENCES
1. The economic impact of stroke in Australia. Deloitte Access
Economics for the National Stroke Foundation; 2013 [cited
2018 Sept 14]. Available from: https: //www2.deloitte.
com/content/dam/Deloitte/au/Documents/Economics/
deloitte-au-economic-impact-stroke-australia-010313.pdf.
2. The economic cost of spinal cord injury and traumatic brain
injury in Australia. The Victorian Neurotrauma Initiative;
2009 [cited 2018 Sept 14]. Available from: http: //www.
spinalcure.org.au/pdf/Economic-cost-of-SCI-and-TBI-in-
Au-2009.pdf.
3. Thibaut A, Chatelle C, Ziegler E, Bruno MA, Laureys S, Gos-
series O. Spasticity after stroke: physiology, assessment
and treatment. Brain Inj 2013; 27: 1093–1105.
4. Rizzo MA, Hadjimichael OC, Preiningerova J, Vollmer TL.
Prevalence and treatment of spasticity reported by multiple
sclerosis patients. Mult Scler 2004; 10: 589–595.
5. Sommerfeld DK, Eek EU, Svensson AK, Holmqvist LW, von
Arbin MH. Spasticity after stroke: its occurrence and as-
sociation with motor impairments and activity limitations.
Stroke 2004; 35: 134–139.
6. Urban PP, Wolf T, Uebele M, Marx JJ, Vogt T, Stoeter P,
et al. Occurence and clinical predictors of spasticity after
ischemic stroke. Stroke 2010; 41: 2016–2020.
7. Lundstrom E, Smits A, Borg J, Terent A. Four-fold increase
in direct costs of stroke survivors with spasticity compared
with stroke survivors without spasticity: the first year after
the event. Stroke 2010; 41: 319–324.
8. Radensky PW, Archer JW, Dournaux SF, O’Brien CF. The
59
estimated cost of managing focal spasticity: a physician
practice patterns survey. Neurorehabil Neural Repair
2001; 15: 57–68.
9. Zorowitz RD, Gillard PJ, Brainin M. Poststroke spasticity:
sequelae and burden on stroke survivors and caregivers.
Neurology 2013; 80: S45–S52.
10. Burridge JH, Wood DE, Hermens HJ, Voerman GE, Johnson
GR, Van Wijck F, et al. Theoretical and methodological
considerations in the measurement of spasticity. Disabil
Rehabil 2005; 27: 69–80.
11. Platz T, Eickhof C, Nuyens G, Vuadens P. Clinical scales
for the assessment of spasticity, associated phenomena,
and function: a systematic review of the literature. Disabil
Rehabil 2005; 27: 7–18.
12. Aloraini SM, Gaverth J, Yeung E, MacKay-Lyons M. Assess-
ment of spasticity after stroke using clinical measures: a
systematic review. Disabil Rehabil 2015; 37: 2313–2323.
13. Sheean G, Lannin NA, Turner-Stokes L, Rawicki B, Snow
BJ. Botulinum toxin assessment, intervention and after-
care for upper limb hypertonicity in adults: international
consensus statement. Eur J Neurol 2010; 17: S74–S93.
14. Olver J, Esquenazi A, Fung VS, Singer BJ, Ward AB. Bo-
tulinum toxin assessment, intervention and aftercare for
lower limb disorders of movement and muscle tone in
adults: international consensus statement. Eur J Neurol
2010; 17: S57–S73.
15. Held JP, Pierrot-Deseilligny E. Rééducation motrice des
affections neurologiques. Paris: J. B. Balliere et fils; 1969.
16. Akpinar P, Atici A, Ozkan FU, Aktas I, Kulcu DG, Sari A, et
al. Reliability of the Modified Ashworth Scale and Modified
Tardieu Scale in patients with spinal cord injuries. Spinal
Cord 2017; 55: 944–949.
17. Mehrholz J, Wagner K, Meissner D, Grundmann K, Zange
C, Koch R, et al. Reliability of the Modified Tardieu Scale
and the Modified Ashworth Scale in adult patients with
severe brain injury: a comparison study. Clin Rehabil
2005; 19: 751–759.
18. Haugh AB, Pandyan AD, Johnson GR. A systematic review
of the Tardieu Scale for the measurement of spasticity.
Disabil Rehabil 2006; 28: 899–907.
19. Fosang AL, Galea MP, McCoy AT, Reddihough DS, Story I.
Measures of muscle and joint performance in the lower
limb of children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol
2003; 45: 664–670.
20. Ben-Shabat E, Palit M, Fini NA, Brooks CT, Winter A, Hol-
land AE. Intra- and interrater reliability of the Modified
Tardieu Scale for the assessment of lower limb spasticity
in adults with neurologic injuries. Arch Phys Med Rehabil
2013; 94: 2494–2501.
21. Naghdi S, Ansari NN, Ghorbani-Rad S, Senobari M, Sahraian
MA. Intra-rater reliability of the Modified Tardieu Scale in
patients with multiple sclerosis. Neurol Sci 2017; 38: 93–99.
22. Waninge A, Rook RA, Dijkhuizen A, Gielen E, van der
Schans CP. Feasibility, test-retest reliability, and interrater
reliability of the Modified Ashworth Scale and Modified
Tardieu Scale in persons with profound intellectual and
multiple disabilities. Res Dev Disabil 2011; 32: 613–620.
23. Boyd RN, Graham HK. Objective measurement of clini-
cal findings in the use of botulinum toxin type A for the
management of children with cerebral palsy. Eur J Neurol
1999; 6: 23–35.
24. Harrell FE, Slaughter JC. Biostatistics for biomedical re-
search. Chapt 16 – Analysis of observer variability and
measurement agreementNashville, TN: Vanderbilt Uni-
versity; 2016 [cited 2018 Sept 14]. Available from: http:
//hbiostat.org/doc/bbr.pdf.
25. Efron B, Tibshirani R. An introduction to the bootstrap.
New York: Chapman & Hall; 1993.
26. Nalysnyk L, Papapetropoulos S, Rotella P, Simeone JC,
Alter KE, Esquenazi A. OnabotulinumtoxinA muscle injec-
tion patterns in adult spasticity: a systematic literature
review. BMC Neurol 2013; 13: 1–11.
J Rehabil Med 51, 2019