Jewish Life Digital Edition September 2015 | Page 90
YOM KIPPUR 5776
WHILE THE EXISTENCE OF SUCH A ROPE IS WIDELY
THOUGHT TO BE TRUE, THERE ARE SEVERAL HISTORICAL
AND HALACHIC PROBLEMS WITH IT.
discussion of the sudden deaths of Nadav
and Avihu,[3] Aharon’s two sons. When
they were killed within the mishkan
(Vayikra 10:1-3), “lifnei Hashem,” Moshe
requested their Levite cousins, Mishael
and Eltzafan, retrieve the bodies (Vayikra
10:4-5). Tarat Kohanim cites a debate between Rabbi Eliezar and Rabbi Akiva
about what transpired. Rabbi Eliezar says
that an angel struck down Nadav and Avihu while they were in the Kodesh Hakodashim and then pushed them out to die
in an area where a Levite may enter; subsequently, their Levite cousins removed
their bodies. Rabbi Akiva opines that the
phrase “lifnei Hashem” means they died
within the Kodesh Hakodashim and the
Levites removed the bodies by impaling
them with iron spears and dragging them
out. Hence, according to both accounts,
the Levites did not enter the Kodesh Hakodashim to remove the bodies.[4]
From all of the above, the following is
clear: during the Second Temple period,
especially, there was a particular concern
regarding the Kohen Gadol dying and the
permissibility of entering the Holy of Holies to retrieve his body. As it was preferable to avoid entering the sanctified area,
the idea of tying a rope to the Kohen Gadol seems logical. However, it is somewhat
puzzling that no source for such a rope is
found in the Tanach, the Mishnah, the
Talmud or in midrashei halachah. Rambam does not mention it in Yad Hachazakah [5] nor do any other Rishonim discuss it. It is not mentioned in the Ashkenazic Avodah piyyut “Amitz Koach” (circa
tenth century) nor in the older Sephardic
Avodah piyyut “Atah Konanta.” Moreover,
it is worth noting that the rope is not
mentioned in the Apocrypha, the Dead
Sea Scrolls or the pseudepigrapha. Finally,
one of the best eyewitnesses of Beit
Hamikdash activities, Josephus, fails to
note the existence of such a rope.[6]
86 JEWISH LIFE ■ ISSUE 88
In contemporary Torah literature, the
custom is mentioned in different sources
with certain variations: it appears as a rope,
a chain around the ankle and a chain
around the waist. In most of these texts, no
primary source is cited. Many modern sefarim refer to the custom as a “Talmudic
tradition,” even though, as mentioned
above, there is no Talmudic source for it. In
the Zohar, however, the custom is mentioned twice. The Zohar on Parashat Acharei Mot (67a) describes the Kohen Gadol’s
preparation before entering the Kodesh
Hakodashim and states that “a gold chain
was tied to his leg,”[7] with no explanation
or additional detail.[8] In the Zohar on
Parashat Emor (102a) the description of
the Kohen Gadol’s entry into the Kodesh
Hakodashim includes this statement: “Rav
Yitzchak said: ‘One rope was tied to the Kohen’s leg when he went in, so that should
he die there they could pull him out.’” [9]
Such a rope may have also served another purpose: to confirm whether the Kohen
Gadol was dead or alive, since no one was
allowed in the Beit Hamikdash throughout
the duration of the Yom Kippur Avodah.
Vayikra 16:17 states that no person could
be in the Ohel Moed when the Kohen Gadol entered the Kodesh Hakodashim, and
Chazal [10] understood this to be a prohibition on entering the Beit Hamikdash
building-which applied to people and even
to angels[11]-while the Kohen Gadol was
within the Holy of Holies.
While the existence of such a rope is
widely thought to be true, there are several
historical and halachic problems with it.
The Gemara (Yoma 53b) relates that there
was once a Kohen Gadol who recited a long
prayer while in the Heichal (main sanctuary building). His fellow Kohanim assumed that he had died, and decided to enter the Heichal to look for him (obviously,
the implication being there was no rope)
[12] On the way in they met the Kohen
Gadol coming out and reprimanded him
because, as stated in Yoma 5:1, he should
not have prolonged his prayer in the
Kodesh Hakodashim.
Rabbi Chiya relates (Yoma 19b) that
once when a Tzeduki Kohen Gadol was
still in the Heichal, those outside in the
Azarah (Temple courtyard) heard a
sound, and assumed that an angel had hit
him in the face. They entered the Heichal
and found him dead. Again, the implication is that there was no chain attached
to this Kohen Gadol.[13]
Furthermore, a gold chain around the
Kohen’s leg can be a serious halachic problem. Rambam (Biat Mikdash 9:15) lists
eighteen things that invalidate the Beit
Hamikdash service, one of which is a Kohen who wears an extra “garment!” Such
an act would not only invalidate the service, but a Kohen who thus performs the
Avodah would incur death at the hands of
Heaven (Rambam, Klei Hamikdash 10:45). Rambam, here, seems to imply (ibid.)
that the prohibition is limited to wearing
an extra layer of the standard priestly
clothes. However, Rashi (Zevachim 18a,
s.v., “yitur”), the Sifrei (Tzav 2:1) and Rambam elsewhere (Klei Hamikdash 10:8) imply that any extra garment or accessory
can be problematic, and this is how the
Aruch Hashulchan Ha’atid (Klei Hamikdash 31:7) understands the gemara’s conclusion (Zevachim 18a). For something to
SUCH A ROPE MAY HAVE ALSO SERVED ANOTHER
PURPOSE: TO CONFIRM WHETHER THE KOHEN GADOL WAS
DEAD OR ALIVE, SINCE NO ONE WAS ALLOWED IN THE BEIT
HAMIKDASH THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE YOM
KIPPUR AVODAH.