Ipsos in SiMa Curiosity Nov/Dec 2017 | Page 33

1.4 FOR CERTAIN APPLICATIONS OF AI, PEOPLE ARE NOT CONVINCED THAT THE BENEFITS OUTWEIGH THE RISKS — ESPECIALLY WHEN IT’S ABOUT RELINQUISHING CONTROL OF HUMAN LIFE AND THEIR MONEY The research explored people’s perceptions of the risks and benefits of different types of AI applications. The findings reveal that Australians believe there to be significant risk associated with the use of some forms of AI, and that the risks of these outweigh the benefits, particularly when it means potentially losing control over human life and their money. Of all the AI applications presented to respondents, facial recognition computers which can learn identities through CCTV video to catch criminals and computers that can recognise speech and answer questions were considered to be the most benign, with fewer than 10% believing that the risks are slightly or much bigger than the benefits. The AI applications perceived risky were those where human life could be put at risk — driverless vehicles (31% believe the risks are slightly or much bigger than the benefits) and robots which can make their own decisions and can be used by the armed forces (42% believe the risks are slightly or much bigger than the benefits). Meanwhile, leaving their money in the hands of AI was also deemed to be risky — 34% considered the risks of using AI in making investments in the stock market to be slightly or much bigger than the benefits. Brave New World: Are consumers ready for AI? | Ipsos 12