Internet Learning Volume 3, Number 1, Spring 2014 | Page 62
Many Shades of MOOC's
the learners were “pay to play.” Entrance
into the MOOC was free of charge. Learners
who wished to receive academic credit
in UTACONs RN-to-BSN program enrolled
to take a final summative examination
and paid the online proctoring service
directly for that service (<$30 with the fee
varying dependent upon the individual’s
preference for when the examination was
scheduled). The only additional charge for
receiving credit was that associated with
the established process for receiving “credit
by exam” ($25). Learners, who wished
to receive CEU for the course, paid the CE
provider $25 for obtaining a certificate for
the 45 hours of continuing education credit.
An Operations Team was responsible
for identifying the flow of information
to allow individuals to sign up for the
MOOC, participate, and reach their desired
end point (academic credit, continuing education
credit, certificate of completion) in
a seamless way. Individuals on this team
include representatives from the university’s
Departments of Distance Education
and Admissions along with the College of
Nursing and Academic Partnerships.
A Course Development team was
responsible for the content and the presentation
of the course. After review, a decision
was made to use Canvas Open Network
as the Learning Management System.
Identification of course objectives, learning
outcomes, curricula flow, and included
content and evaluation methods were the
responsibility of the course faculty. Media
experts and instructional designers from
Academic Partnerships assisted in course
construction on the Canvas Open Network.
Working collaboratively, open access
learning artifacts appropriate to the course
objectives were identified so as to avoid any
costs associated with books or other supplementary
material.
Outcomes and Next Steps
In August 2013, the course went
live with a “soft launch” – limited enrollment
– to pilot test the course structure
and processes. On the start date, there were
approximately 300 learners enrolled. In a
start of the course survey, the following information
was obtained:
Country of origin
• 70% were from the United States
• 9% were from Western Europe
• 7% were from Africa
• 4% were from South America
• 2% were from Central/East Asia
• English was the primary language for
75% of the participants
Professional discipline (see Figure 1)
• 57% of respondents were nurses.
• 43% of these respondents were interested
in course credit
• 14% were interested in CEUs
Figure 1. Breakdown of respondents by
profession.
���
���
����
����
���
Learner experience
����
������
����������
��������������
���������
���������
������
����������
In later surveys, additional data
were collected about learners’ experience.
The course load was in line with learner
expectations. Learners expected between 2
61