International Journal on Criminology Volume 4, Number 2, Winter 2016 | Page 151
International Journal on Criminology
Leman-Langlois, Stéphane. 2007. "Le modèle 'Vérité et réconciliation.' Victimes,
bourreaux et institutionnalisation du pardon." Informations Sociales 127 (7): 112–
121.
Llewellyn, Jennifer. 2007. "Truth Commissions and Restorative Justice." In Handbook
of Restorative Justice, eds. Gerry Johnstone and Daniel Van Ness. Portland, OR:
Willan, 351–371.
Llewellyn, Jennifer J., and Robert L. Howse. 2002. Restorative Justice: A Conceptual
Framework. Canada: Law Commission.
Lodigiani Giovanni Angelo. 2011. “La prospettiva del rendere giustizia nel canone
scritturistico ebraico-cris¬tiano.” Themis 9: 41–45.
Luke, Garth, and Bronwyn Lind. 2002. "Reducing Juvenile Crime: Conferencing
Versus Court." Crime and Justice Bulletin 69.
Mannozzi, Grazia. 2013. "Victim-Offender Mediation in Areas Characterized by
High Levels of Organized Crime." European Journal of Criminology 10 (2): 187–
205.
Marshall, Tony F. 1999. Restorative Justice: An Overview. London: Home Office
Research Development and Statistics Directorate.
Mbanzoulou, Paul. 2011. La Violence Scolaire. Mais où est Passé l’Adulte? Paris:
L’Harmattan.
McCold, Paul. 2004. “What is the Role of Community in Restorative Justice Theory
and Practice?” In Critical Issues in Restorative Justice, eds. Howard Zehr and Barb
Toews. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press, 155–172.
McCold, Paul, and Ted Wachtel. 2002. "Restorative Justice Theory Validation."
In Restorative Justice: Theoretical Foundations, eds. Elmar G.M. Weitekamp and
Hans-Joergen Kerner. Portland, OR: Willan, 110–142.
McCold, Paul, and Ted Wachtel. 2003. "In Pursuit of Paradigm: A Theory of
Restorative Justice." International Institute for Restorative Practices. http://www.
iirp.edu/iirpWebsites/web/uploads/article_pdfs/paradigm.pdf.
McDowell, Lana A., Virginia L. Crocker, Emily L. Evett, and Damian G. Cornelison.
2014. "Perceptions of Restorative Justice Concepts: An Evaluation of University
Housing Residents." Contemporary Justice Review 17 (3): 346–361.
150