INTER-SECTION Volume III - Page 44

| Eline B.J. Amsing | it important to have a voice in the decision-making process. This underlines the importance of the values assessment per stakeholder group in an early stage of the project, because then values-centred choices can be made and sustainable outcomes are secured because the places created are appreciated by the people they are created for. The insights from this study contribute to a better understanding of the values attributed to archaeological heritage by different groups of stakeholders. However, more data from a larger group of people about their views on archaeology would aid further research on heritage values and how the heritage sector could respond to this, both in the type of projects we initiate and the ways in which we engage with various stakeholders in heritage management. Acknowledgements Firstly, I would like to thank Dr. Monique van den Dries for being my thesis supervisor and for guiding me in writing this article. I would also like to thank Evert van Ginkel for his help and support in writing my thesis and all 22 interviewees for their willingness to participate in the research. Lastly, I would like to thank the editorial board of INTER-SECTION and the peer reviewer for their suggestions and reviews. 1 The modes of communication (Fung 2006) and the level of participation on the ‘participation ladder’ (Van Houwelingen et. al. 2014), as well as the efforts of the direct stakeholders to engage with the indirect stakeholders are further elaborated upon in Amsing 2015. These analyses are not included in the present article, as exceeding the scope of this article. Bibliography Amsing, E.B.J., 2015. Assessing all values and interests. Stakeholder engagement in the development of archaeological site parks in The Netherlands. Leiden: Leiden University, Faculty of Archaeology (unpublished master thesis). Avrami, E., R. Mason and M. de la Torre, 2000. Values and Heritage Conservation. Research Report. Los Angeles: The Getty Conservation Institute. Bureau BUITEN 2012. Limes uitvoeringsagenda publieksbereik. Plan van aanpak. Internal report BUITEN, Bureau voor Economie & Omgeving, Utrecht. Duineveld, M., 2007. Ons erfgoed! Over het gesloten en elitaire karakter van het Nederlandse archeologiebeleid. Levend Erfgoed. Vakblad voor public folklore en public history 4(1), 10-15. Duineveld M., K. van Assche and R. Beunen, 2008. Uitgesloten amateurs in het nieuwe landschap van de Nederlandse archeologie. Vrijetijdstudies 26(4), 29-39. Duineveld M. and J. Kolen, 2009. Het sociaalwetenschappelijk onderzoek van erfgoed, in A.N. van der Zande and R. During (eds). Erfgoed en ruimtelijke planning; Sterft, gij oude vormen en gedachten!. Den Haag: Sdu Uitgevers BV, 135–153. Frijhoff, W., 2007. Dynamisch erfgoed. Amsterdam: SUN. Fung, A., 2006. Varieties of Participation in Complex Governance. Public Administration Review 66(1), 66-76. Gemeente Leiden, 2008. Plan van Aanpak Archeologisch Park Matilo. Internal report Gemeente Leiden. Gemeente Leiden, 2009. Raadsvoorstel 09.0042. Internal report Gemeente Leiden. Groenendijk, H. (2015). Meer democratie in de archeologie. Westerheem. Het tijdschrift voor de Nederlandse archeologie, oktober 2015(5), 281-289. Jerome, P., 2014. The Values-Based Approach to Cultural-Heritage Preservation. APT Bulletin 45(2), 3-8. Kolen, J., 2008. Een functionele geschiedenis, in M. Eerden, E. Luiten, A. Zande, van der., J. Kolen & R. During (eds). Op historische gronden: erfgoed in een context van ruimtelijk ontwerp, planning en democratie. Utrecht: Projectbureau Belvedere, 83-102. Mason, R., 2002. Assessing Values in Conservation Planning: Methodological Issues and Choices, in M. de la Torre (ed). Assessing the Values of Cultural Heritage. Los Angeles: The Getty Conservation Institute, 5-30. Myers, D., S.N. Smith and M. Shaer, 2010. A Didactic Case Study of Jarash Archaeological Site, Jordan: Stakeholders and Heritage Values in Site Management. Los Angeles: The Getty Conservation Institute. Projectbureau Leidsche Rijn, 2007. Castellum Hoge Woerd. Stedenbouwkundig plan. Internal report Projectbureau Leidsche Rijn, Utrecht. Provincie Zuid-Holland, 2014. Maatregelenpakket Erfgoedlijnen 2015. Provinciaal blad 3327. Internal report Provincie Zuid-Holland, Den Haag. Van Assche, K., 2004. Signs in time. An interpretive account of urban planning and design, the people and their histories. Wageningen: Wageningen University. Van den Dries, M.H., 2014. Community Archaeology in the Netherlands. Journal of Community Archaeology and Heritage 1(1), 69-88. Van Houwelingen, P., A. Boele and P. Dekker, 2014. Burgermacht op eigen kracht? Een brede verkenning van ontwikkelingen in burgerparticipatie. Den Haag: Sociaal Cultureel Planbureau. p. 42 | VOL III | INTER-SECTION | 2017 | Eline B.J. Amsing | it important to have a voice in the decision-making process. This underlines the importance of the values assessment per stakeholder group in an early stage of the project, because then values-centred choices can be made and sustainable outcomes are secured because the places created are appreciated by the people they are created for. The insights from this study contribute to a better understanding of the values attributed to archaeological heritage by different groups of stakeholders. However, more data from a larger group of people about their views on archaeology would aid further research on heritage values and how the heritage sector could respond to this, both in the type of projects we initiate and the ways in which we engage with various stakeholders in heritage management. Acknowledgements Firstly, I would like to thank Dr. Monique van den Dries for being my thesis supervisor and for guiding me in writing this article. I would also like to thank Evert van Ginkel for his help and support in writing my thesis and all 22 interviewees for their willingness to participate in the research. Lastly, I would like to thank the editorial board of INTER-SECTION and the peer reviewer for their suggestions and reviews. 1 The modes of communication (Fung 2006) and the level of participation on the ‘participation ladder’ (Van Houwelingen et. al. 2014), as well as the efforts of the direct stakeholders to engage with the indirect stakeholders are further elaborated upon in Amsing 2015. These analyses are not included in the present article, as exceeding the scope of this article. Bibliography Amsing, E.B.J., 2015. Assessing all values and interests. Stakeholder engagement in the development of archaeological site parks in The Netherlands. Leiden: Leiden University, Faculty of Archaeology (unpublished master thesis). Avrami, E., R. Mason and M. de la Torre, 2000. Values and Heritage Conservation. Research Report. Los Angeles: The Getty Conservation Institute. Bureau BUITEN 2012. Limes uitvoeringsagenda publieksbereik. Plan van aanpak. Internal report BUITEN, Bureau voor Economie & Omgeving, Utrecht. Duineveld, M., 2007. Ons erfgoed! Over het gesloten en elitaire karakter van het Nederlandse archeologiebeleid. Levend Erfgoed. Vakblad voor public folklore en public history 4(1), 10-15. Duineveld M., K. van Assche and R. Beunen, 2008. Uitgesloten amateurs in het nieuwe landschap van de p. 42 | VOL III | INTER-SECTION | 2017 Nederlandse archeologie. Vrijetijdstudies 26(4), 29-39. Duineveld M. and J. Kolen, 2009. Het sociaalwetenschappelijk onderzoek van erfgoed, in A.N. van der Zande and R. During (eds). Erfgoed en ruimtelijke planning; Sterft, gij oude vormen en gedachten!. Den Haag: Sdu Uitgevers BV, 135–153. Frijhoff, W., 2007. Dynamisch erfgoed. Amsterdam: SUN. Fung, A., 2006. Varieties of Participation in Complex Governance. Public Administration Review 66(1), 66-76. Gemeente Leiden, 2008. Plan van Aanpak Archeologisch Park Matilo. Internal report Gemeente Leiden. Gemeente Leiden, 2009. Raadsvoorstel 09.0042. Internal report Gemeente Leiden. Groenendijk, H. (2015). Meer democratie in de archeologie. Westerheem. Het tijdschrift voor de Nederlandse archeologie, oktober 2015(5), 281-289. Jerome, P., 2014. The Values-Based Approach to Cultural-Heritage Preservation. APT Bulletin 45(2), 3-8. Kolen, J., 2008. Een functionele geschiedenis, in M. Eerden, E. Luiten, A. Zande, van der., J. Kolen & R. During (eds). Op historische gronden: erfgoed in een context van ruimtelijk ontwerp, planning en democratie. Utrecht: Projectbureau Belv ɔ̴ȸ)5ͽHȸ͕ͥYՕ́ ͕مѥ)A5ѡ%Օ́ ̰4)Qɔ͕ͥѡYՕ́ ձɅ!ɥх1)Q ͕مѥ%ѥєԴ)5̰L8MѠ4MȰѥ) ͔MՑ䁽)Ʌ͠ɍMє)ɑ)Mх́!ɥхYՕ́Mє5и)1́Q ͕مѥ%ѥє)Aɽщɕԁ1͍Iܸ ѕմ!)]ɐMѕݭչ%ѕɹɕ)Aɽщɕԁ1͍IUɕи)Aɽ٥iե!и5ɕ)əԸAɽ٥ܸ%ѕɹ)ɕЁAɽ٥iե!!)Y͍,иḾѥѕɕѥٔ)չЁɉͥѡ)ѡȁѽɥ̸]]Uٕͥ)Yɥ̰4 и չɍ䁥)ѡ9ѡɱ̸)ɹ չɍ䁅)!ɥхĠĤ)Y!ݕ@ @Ȱи) ɝɵЁɅɕٕɭم)ݥɝѥѥ!M) ձɕAɕԸ