phases of the project - engineering , procurement , construction and commissioning , to support the MC execution .
The systematic MC execution is to manage work tasks through a common purpose as a strategy for quality systems . It can also promote an integrated operations planning mentality while optimising construction costs and safeguarding technical integrity .
This MC development system can be focus both the owner as well as the contractor to have a common objective and not just be limited to their respective scope of work .
PROJECT DATA GATHERING AND ANALYSIS
Analysis of Data – Cost , Benefit and Risk
Figure 5 illustrates how “ passing the parcel ” significantly affects the cost exposure , benefits and risks if the owner or contractor does not have a systematic MC execution handover plan .
The sample case study analyses the impact of MC delays in terms of capital cost in a Typical Project . This study reveals that failure to achieve MC milestones impacts the project capital cost resulting in cost and time overruns , as well as the next phase ’ s unit strategy , operations and
Cost Cost Overruns
Time Overruns due to MC delays
Estimated Capital Cost
Operating Cost Overruns
Estimated Operating Cost
Construction Phase
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
Operation and Maintenance Phase
Time
Figure 5 : Passing The Parcel : Cost Exposure ( The Q-Team )
Project Milestones
Planned |
Actual |
Time Delays |
Est . Capital |
|
|
|
Cost ( RM ) |
Actual Cost Incurred ( RM )
MC |
Sept . 2000 |
Mar . 2001 |
6 mths |
60 M |
62 M |
2 M |
IA |
Nov . 2000 |
Nov . 2001 |
12 mths |
- |
66 M |
4 M |
FA |
Nov . 2001 |
Nov . 2002 |
12 mths |
- |
68 M |
2 M |
Total |
|
|
30 mths |
- |
- |
8 M |
Table 1 : Sample Case Study : Typical Project
Cost Overruns ( RM )
59