Ingenieur Vol 76 ingenieur 2018 October | Page 77

Figure 5: The “rolling wave” Award Term model In order to enable contracting parties to smoothly transition into PBC, Performance Implementation Plan (PIP) is a provision that facilitates the gradual introduction of performance measurement regimes until a performance baseline is established, consistent with the ramp up of contractor services under the contract. Where the contract does not require a ramp up, or the ramp up is of short duration, or when a contractor has previous experience in implementing a PBC, then PIP may not be required. Through PIP, the initial months after the contract start date will be divided into phases. Appropriate percentages of at-risk margin is then allocated to each phase to balance the risk and reward during transition period. ● ● ● ● Performance Management The management aspect of a PBC must be clarified in a PMF. This is essential so that parties are aware of their respective roles and responsibilities in ensuring the contract is properly administered in a structured manner. Most importantly, at least three decision-making committees must be established to review the performance of the contractor. The recommended frequency, purpose and composition of the committees are as follows: ● ● Monthly Performance Review: This review is to be conducted at least once a month. The purpose is to confirm the result of all performance measures, ascertain the resultant APS for the KPIs achieved for the month and determine the total performance payment that should be paid to the contractor. Since PBC is a self-regulating contract, disputes on KPI calculations must be resolved based on consensus. The composition of this committee normally involves the buyer’s on-site representatives and the contract managers of both parties. Half Yearly Contract Review: This review is to be conducted once every six months to concur to the decisions of the Monthly Performance Review Committee and to ensure proper contract governance. In addition, this committee is responsible for finalising the scores of SPMs and SHIs and performance levels attained by the contractor throughout the evaluation period. The composition of this committee includes the buyer’s capability sustainment m an ager s an d t he p ro c urem ent departments of both parties. Annual Performance Review: The highest- level review committee is to sit once a year 75