Ingenieur Vol 68 Oct-Dec 2016 | Page 29

axis wind turbine (HAWT) and the vertical axis wind turbine (VAWT). HAWTs are very effective in generating electricity from the wind [1] but they are not without their problems, such as the need for yaw mechanisms, regular maintenance and repair for the transmission, additional expenses in reinforcing the tower structure supporting the heavy nacelle, maximising the diameter of the rotor and the number of rotor blades, posing a danger to surrounding animals and birds, a high degree of noise pollution and the rotor having to face the wind direction for effective power extraction [2]. On the other hand, the VAWT is deemed more suitable to be used in urban areas [3]. The VAWT can be scaled down easily and still harness wind energy efficiently in urban areas due to its gearbox and generator being situated in its lower portion (lowering its center of gravity) and its rotor size can be increased or decreased horizontally without affecting its height. A yawing mechanism is not required by the VAWT as it can harness wind energy from all directions. This results in lower manufacturing and maintenance costs because of the simpler structure due to the elimination of the yaw mechanism. The VAWT might harness less wind energy than the HAWT in steady wind but it is fairly efficient in capturing rapidly changing winds such as air gusts. The lower operating rotational speed of a VAWT ensures safety to birds and also produces lower levels of noise. Despite the VAWTs general superiority in comparison with the HAWTs, the VAWT also has its disadvantages such as the relatively lower efficiency (e.g. Savonius rotor) because the wind strikes on both sides of the rotor blade, i.e. one following the wind direction and the other which counters it, thereby neutralizing part of the available wind force. The other disadvantage of the VAWT is the inability of the rotor to start by itself (e.g. Darrieus rotor) [4]. Due to various disadvantages of both the VAWT and the HAWT, the main objective of the project is to overcome these drawbacks by introducing a cross axis wind turbine (CAWT) capable of maximum exploitation of wind power irrespective of the direction of the wind, without necessitating any type of orientation mechanism and providing better self-starting capability. The CAWT takes up the same amount of space as a VAWT but consists of more lift force generating surfaces. The disadvantages in terms of oncoming wind directions for the HAWT and VAWT are illustrated in Figure 1. The HAWT shown in Figure 1 relies on one horizontal wind direction, therefore requiring a yaw mechanism to rotate the wind turbine. Although the VAWT shown in Figure 1 is an omni-directional wind energy device, it is limited to rotating on one axis only, reacting to winds coming along the horizontal axis. As mentioned, the wind conditions in urban areas require specially designed wind turbines to maximise the potential wind energy, hence the novel cross axis wind turbine has been proposed. Figure 1. Comparison between wind direction for HAWT and VAWT 27