Ingenieur Vol 61 January-March 2015 | Page 23

ASEAN Framework Agreement on Services [AFAS] The AFAS was signed by ASEAN Economic Ministers [AEM] with the objectives of: Enhance co-operation in services among ●● Member States in order to improve the efficiency and competitiveness, diversify production capacity, and supply and distribution of services within and outside ASEAN. Eliminate substantially restrictions ●● to trade in services among Member Countries. Liberalise trade in services by expanding ●● the depth and scope of liberalisation beyond those undertaken by ASEAN Member Countries under GATS with the aim of realising a free trade area in services. AFAS has provided a basis for ASEAN Member States to improve Market Access [MA] and ensure equal National Treatment [NT] for service suppliers in all four modes of services supply. The four modes of supply are: Mode 1 [Cross Border Supply], meaning ●● services flow from the home Country into the country of another. Mode 2 [Consumption Abroad], meaning a ●● service consumer from the home country moves into another country to obtain service. Mode 3 [Commercial Presence], implying ●● a service supplier from another country establishes a territorial presence, including through ownership or lease of premises, in the home country to provide a service. Mode 4 [Movement of Natural Persons], ●● meaning persons of one Member Country entering the territory of another Member Country [the home country] to supply a service. ASEAN liberalisation targets for AFAS has suggested the following specific equity thresholds under Commercial Presence [Mode 3] Priority Sectors: 49% by 2006, 51% by 2008, 70% by 2010 Non-priority Sectors: 30% by 2006, 49% by 2008, 51% by 2010, 70% by 2015 Engineering Services Engineering services is categorised as non-priority sector. ASEAN provided for 15% overall flexibility of the sub-sectors list, which may not be committed and/ or may not comply with the agreed parameters of liberalisation. ASEAN through AEM also agreed that Market Access [MA] limitations for a few sub-sectors in the schedules of commitments can still be maintained, such as a maximum of two types of MA limitations for priority services sectors. It should also be noted that AEM has also agreed that NT limitations will be removed on a volunt