Ingenieur April-June 2016 Ingenieur Apr-June 2016 | Page 78

INGENIEUR 5.2 The Contractor shall submit to the CA sufficient information as may be considered reasonable by the CA to interpret, evaluate and give acceptance to the Method Statement. 5.3 The Contractor shall, whenever required by the CA, furnish for its information further and more detailed particulars of the Contractor’s Method Statement … In practice, the following should be the recommended contents of a Method Statement:14 ●● ●● ●● ●● ●● ●● ●● ●● ●● a description of work, i.e. overall and/or particular work to be undertaken; identification of the party/parties under the said work; the duration of the activity or activities;15 cross-reference of the activity or activities to the Work Programme; a risk assessment for each operation or activity of the work to be undertaken; the control and safety measures for the said activity or activities cross-references to the applicable statutory provision/by-laws; the identification of the actual place where the activity is to be undertaken; the identification of the access and safe areas for the activity to be undertaken; and identification and description of any special considerations, e.g. permits/ approvals from authorities, protection of third parties,16 security systems, resources required,17 etc. Time for Submission In tandem with the requirement for the Work Programme, the contractor is obliged to submit the Method Statement as expressly stated in the contract. The majority of the standard forms of contract as alluded to above, have included specific periods for the submission of the General Method Statement for the overall works, e.g. within fourteen (14) days of receipt of the Letter 14 15 16 17 6 76 See Fenwick Elliott LLP Dictionary of Construction Terms p 175. Including when these are to be undertaken. E.g., the public, etc. E.g., human resources, plant, equipment, etc. VOL - MARCH 2016 VOL65 55JANUARY JUNE 2013 of Acceptance,18 etc. In the absence of any such specific time period being stipulated in the contract, the contractor is obliged to do so at the same time as the submission of the Work Programme19or within a reasonable time of the acceptance of the tender. In regard to a Method Statement pertaining to a specific activity, here it is necessary for the contractor to follow any specific time periods stipulated in the contract; failing which the contractor must follow any time lines ascribed to that particular activity in the Accepted20 Work Programmes. In doing so, the contractor must be mindful of the fact that it must allow sufficient time for the Contract Administrator to undertake the approval21 process as it may compromise its remedies for any ensuing delays. Failure to Submit Method Statement Although most of the standard form provisions pertaining to the contractor’s obligation to submit Method Statements are written in mandatory language, they however fail to state the sanctions or consequences of the contractor’s default in meeting the said obligations. Here, similar considerations to the contractor’s failure in respect of the submission of the Work Programme should be equally applicable. What is clear is that the following matters may be relevant: ●● ●● 18 19 20 21 22 23 Where the Contractor fails to submit the General/Overall Method Statement, the Contractor cannot be stopped from commencing or proceeding with the Works22 but this default may compromise any of its consequential claims. Should the failure be in relation to a specific activity or operation, the consequences of the default can be in the following forms: »» the application of any contractual sanction or remedy, e.g. suspension of the specific work/activity, determining the Contractor’s employment,23 etc. and See clause 12.1(b) JKR Form 203 & 203A (Rev 1/2010). See Item 5.1 Appendix B, The SCL Protocol p 68. Or Approved. Or acceptance, e.g. evaluating, processing, etc. Unless the contract expressly stipulates to the contrary. If such a ground is expressly permitted.