Ingenieur April-June 2016 Ingenieur Apr-June 2016 | Page 39

and reduce income disparities,” says Bernie Sheahan, Global Director for Infrastructure and Natural Resources at the International Finance Corporation (IFC). “Analytical work shows that, on average, a 10% increase in the stock of infrastructure contributes to 1% growth in the long term.” Sheahan says that infrastructure has contributed about half of the recent acceleration in growth in sub-Saharan Africa. In China real income by 2007 was about 6% higher than it would have been had its inter-urban expressway network not been built. According to an estimate by consultants Wendell Cox and Jean Love, the US interstate highway system has returned more than US$6 in productivity for each dollar it cost. Infrastructure investment in the transport, energy, water telecommunication and social sectors (schools, hospitals and prisons) presents advantages for Governments, corporations and investors alike, particularly in the current economic climate. It is needed both in developing countries, where good infrastructure has yet to be built, and in developed nations, where older infrastructures are screaming for a facelift. Hence there are boundless opportunities for private companies, from engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) to real estate to financial services. DUAL IMPACT Additionally, infrastructure investment has both a direct and an indirect effect on growth, contributing to job creation in the short-term and, by smoothing out wrinkles in supply chains, to increased economic efficiency in the long run. And though it requires public funds, it doesn’t have to burden Governments as much as social assistance programmes, especially when done via public-private partnerships (PPPs). Finally, in today’s low interest-rate environment, infrastructure projects can attract institutional investors. “They offer long-term, stable cash flow, and many of these sectors are regulated, so entry barriers are high,” says Stefano Gatti, Associate Professor in the Department of Finance at Bocconi University in Italy. The overall numbers are staggering. According to the World Bank, low and middle-income countries alone should invest an additional US$1 trillion to US$1.5 trillion in infrastructure annually until 2020. “There is definitely a lot of demand in Latin America and the Caribbean,” says Olga Lucia de Narvaez, lead investment officer at the InterAmerican Investment Corporation. “The region should increase investment by at least 2% of GDP over the next several years, about US$150 billion to US$250 billion per year.” The Asia Development Bank estimates that, between 2010 and 2020, the Asia Pacific region will require nearly US$8 trillion in infrastructure investment, while the African Development Bank says that sub-Saharan Africa requires US$50 billion dollars a year more than it gets now. As for the developed world, the American Society for Civil Engineers calculates that the US should invest US$3.6 trillion by 2020, while the European Commission puts infrastructure needs across the European Union at more than US$2 trillion over the next five years. These figures can over whelm public administrations. “The balance sheets of European Governments are managed under the stability pact, so the room available for public spending is limited,” says Gatti. P.D Rwelamila, Professor of Project Management at the University of South Africa, concurs: “There is an enormous demand for infrastructure across the African SCENARIOS FOR GLOBAL INFRSTRUCTURE INVESTMENT NEEDS VERSUS PUBLIC SECTOR FUNDING SOURCES – TO 2030 Total need Through 2030 US$57 trillion US$57 trillion US$57 trillion Government Spending 3% of GDP 2% of GDP 3.5% of GDP Total gap US$8.4 trillion US$24.6 trillion Zero Annual gap US$500 billion US$1.5 trillion Zero Source: OECD; McKinsey & Co; Global Insight 37