Ingenieur April-June 2016 Ingenieur Apr-June 2016 | Page 10

INGENIEUR of funds that are required to manage and maintain existing infrastructure assets. Notably, some of the old infrastructures are now due to be rehabilitated or reconstructed to extend their useful life. This is where public-private par tnerships become crucial in ensuring the sustainability and continuity in the management of our infrastructure assets. Building infrastructure is relatively easy, however we fail miserably in maintaining them to serve their purpose during their life-cycle and to further enhance them. The management of Government infrastructures and facilities has long been inadequately or poorly managed due to limited budgets. Management was commonly driven either by short-term requirements of the operations or property rather than longterm requirements. The limited operating and maintenance budget is always a challenge to asset owners whose objectives for maintenance tend to be related to minimising costs in the short term rather than assessing and enhancing the value-add of the asset to the organisation. So, it is not surprising that we tend to focus on ad hoc and breakdown maintenance. These run to failure and ad-hoc firefighting actions are reactive in nature and not cost effective especially when they involve assets of high value which affect the service delivery process. The real challenge to implement good asset management lies on several factors: i. lack of standards and guidelines on asset 86 VOL - JUNE 2016 VOL66 55APRIL JUNE 2013 management that can be used to measure quality and performance levels; ii. lack of explicit asset objectives which lead to little monitoring on the performance of an asset or its management; iii. lack of, or no awareness of, the opportunity cost of the assets; iv. lack of local expertise in providing immediate response to failure; and v. lack of established facility management practitioners in the local market who can provide advice or assistance . These challenges have increased with the existence of more complex buildings, especially those with unique architecture and buildings equipped with highly sophisticated state-of-the-art technologies. Likewise, frequent mishaps such as severe leaking and collapse of ceilings and roofs of buildings to badly maintained roads, drains and other public amenities, call for accountability and transparency by the Government in these areas which have compromised service deliveries to the public. The Government is vigilant on the predicament of her citizens and has proactively come out with initiatives to ensure better management of its infrastructure assets and that of the private sector as well. In general, the road map in managing the Government’s assets can be marked with several milestones as evident in the formation of National Committees, the establishment of policies and strategies, the development of guidelines and system applications, the development of human capital and competencie s which are continuously carried out to ensure sustainability and effectiveness in this national imperative. As such, the first National Asset and Facility Management (NAFAM) Convention which was held in 2007 was a starting point of the Government’s total commitment to systematic, comprehensive and integrated asset management. Among the resolutions adopted at NAFAM 2007 Convention were to create an Asset Management Framework; the establish an application system to record all assets and monitor the success of the programme; improving the process and procurement of asset of service providers; and developing a suitable Government Financial Model for asset management and capacity building in asset management. Subsequent to this was the establishment of the Government Asset Management Committee with the objective of ensuring that Government assets are managed efficiently, economically and safely in the practice of Total Asset Management (TAM) for the country. The responsibilities of the committee are to determine the direction for t he imp lement at ion and development of policie s, strategies, action plan and guidelines for a comprehensive and integrated asset management system to produce Key Performance Indicators in