iGB E-zines iGB e-zine Sweden | Page 17

Part 3: The position of the monopolies Part 3: The position of the monopolies The current position of Svenska Spel and ATG within the Swedish market remains controversial and both will be fighting to retain this post-regulation A report in mid-June from the finance ministry entitled ‘Central market issues in the reorganisation of the gaming market’ made it clear that the issue of the future of Svenska Spel and its horseracing counterpart ATG is far from settled. Worryingly for the betting operators, the government indicated that the continuing debate should include a discussion around additional sports betting levies. The report stated that Svenska Spel’s adaptation to the new regulated market – and how that affected the economics of ports and horseracing — was “important for the implementation of the reform”. In light of this, the government has set out the terms for a further report that will investigate how a “standalone financing model for horse and sport competitions, such as a market fee” might be designed and implemented. The final report will completed no later than the end of October 2020. Step back in time Hoffstedt from BOS says the move – and particularly its timing — was a backward step. “To even consider introducing a le vy on sports and horse race betting is taking a step back in time, instead of embracing the licensing system,” he says. “In a functioning licensing market, commercial deals will be struck between the gambling operators and sports, such as sponsor deals, streaming rights and data access. Having government-imposed levies remind us more of the monopoly model we are about to abandon.” It is the wording within the section entitled ‘Investigat(ing) a model for financing the sports movement’ from the finance ministry report that is perhaps the most controversial within the relatively short report. It pointed out that in its original inception, the sports betting monopoly established in 1934 was formed with the express intention of directly paying the profits to sport. More recently, the model changed to one where Svenska Spel directs profits back to sport via the sponsorship route. In the words of the report, “in connection with the reorganisation of the gaming market… the government stated that compensation should be paid to sport when sports events are used as bets. “The reorganisation of the gaming market changes the prerequisites for Svenska Spel to Sweden: The transition to regulation in one of Europe’s most advanced digital markets 17