iGB E-zines iGB e-zine New Jersey | Page 7

Part 1: Data review Chart 2: New Jersey sports betting handle by channel ($m) June 2018 – January 2019 Chart 3: New Jersey sports betting by channel, June 2018 – January 2019 400 400 350 350 300 300 250 250 200 200 150 150 100 100 100 90 70 60 80 50 40 30 50 50 0 0 Jun-18 Jul-18 Aug-18 Land-based handle Sep-18 Oct-18 Online handle Source: NJDGE Nov-18 Dec-18 Total handle Jan-19 20 10 0 Jun-18 Jul-18 Aug-18 Sep-18 Land-based handle (% of total) Oct-18 Nov-18 Dec-18 Jan-19 Online handle (% of total) Source: NJDGE rewarded by an undoubtedly strong start to proceedings. The $113m in gross win recorded in the eight months to January (see Figure 1) proves that the appetite for regulated sports betting is as was predicted by the promoters of New Jersey’s entrance to the market. The online/mobile debate The data is what can be termed a good start but more than that, a delve into the detail provided on the handle (turnover) via both land- based and online channels provides some useful ammunition for those arguing that other markets must necessarily look at online – and particularly mobile – if they are to provide their consumers with a viable alternative to the offshore books. As can be seen, the handle in land-based venues was by no means a letdown. The monthly figure rose (along with the opening of more venues) from an opening $16.4m in June to $80.3m in January. In November it reached a monthly high of $92.1m. However, as can be seen from Chart 2 , the land-based handle figure was quickly eclipsed by online. After the first online sportsbook DraftKings opened in August – timed for the start of the NFL season – the market achieved a handle total of $21.7m for that month. Subsequently it swiftly rose, easily overtaking land-based handle in the second month of opening and hitting $305m in January this year. A clearer picture comes from the chart showing the percentage of handle by channel. As can be seen in Chart 3, online now accounts for more than three-quarters of the total, nudging towards 80%. This online dominance poses questions for any regulators in the US that believe sports betting should be confined to venues. This steady increase in the percentage of handle flowing via online versus the steadier picture for land-based gaming is understandable given the constant drip of new operators and products entering the New Jersey market in the past six months or more. What will be interesting in the months to come will be to see how far the newer online products drive the market on. A mixed picture by sport What is also evident from the early New Jersey numbers is the seasonality of US sports, and with it US sports betting. We already knew from Nevada the extent to which the bookies see their numbers fluctuate with the ebbs and flows of the US sporting seasons. So it is with New Jersey and as the state was ready for its first NFL season, it benefitted accordingly. As the regular NFL season ramped up in the last quarter of 2018, so the handle on football also rose (see Table 1). Basketball will be the next sport to enjoy a seasonal betting boost when March Madness comes around, followed by baseball as the season gets into full swing (pun intended). For those looking on from Europe, what will be interesting will be to see whether football and tennis, the mainstays of in-play betting in the rest of the world, push up the numbers for the category in New Jersey. Major League Soccer (MLS) also got underway at the start of March New Jersey: data and lessons from the first five years of the US’ leading digital market 7