iGB Affiliate 68 April/May | Page 33

FEATURE an operator wants is to have that same traffic exposed to negative reports about its brand. Any individual affiliate doing this can be ignored because each one is a drop in the ocean. However, with a reasonable number of mid-sized affiliates working together to highlight when a program behaves in a manner that makes it high risk or untrustworthy as a partner, this in turn presents a far bigger disincentive to the operator. What other issues would be on the affiliate union’s radar? We are still in the very early days of this project. If we don’t get a large enough response this conversation may be where the project concludes. I don’t want to get too far ahead of ourselves in terms of looking for new issues to take up before we deal with the basics. I do not want to be at the head of the table. I am looking to help affiliates come together. That’s as far as my views should influence the agenda of the organisation. After that my hope would be that the membership will collectively decide the issues that we need to review, and I wouldn’t want to define the scope of what that may include. The free flow of ideas and opinions is a crucial asset that will help affiliates engage. How will it work alongside other initiatives, such as Tom Galanis’ iGAA? While a few people have spoken to me about Tom Galanis’ iGAA initiative I want to be clear that I don’t know Tom personally and don’t have an in-depth knowledge of what he intends. Regardless, I can be nothing but glowingly positive about anyone who’s trying to help affiliates redress the balance of power and would offer my absolute support to Tom and iGAA. From the iGAA site it appears they will look to focus more on regulatory compliance. Our focus would be more on discouraging programs from engaging in predatory and unethical changes to their contracts. and get a working framework in place to allow for the review of issues as they come up. So I would hope the union will be able to review several issues within this period as they arise and form a consensus about any action that needs to be taken. The co-ordination of this many people will always present some challenges and the “I have absolutely no doubt there will be overlap and scope for co-operation with the iGAA, which is what this project is all about” I look forward to getting to know and working with Tom as our respective projects develop, and I have absolutely no doubt there will be overlap and scope for co-operation between us, which is what this project is all about. You set a target of 50-plus interested affiliates by the end of March to move forward with this initiative? How did this go? We extended the deadline to the end of April to ensure iGB Affiliate readers have the opportunity to consider whether they want to take part in this initiative. We’ve had around a quarter of the responses needed to meet the low end of our target. I think that’s great given the limited coverage we’ve had to date. But a quarter of the responses we need isn’t enough to make this work effectively, so any affiliate that would consider participating or that wants more information should contact me at: [email protected]. If the union goes ahead as planned, what do you hope it will achieve in the first 18 months? It would be a huge step forward to have a collective of aff