iGB Affiliate 68 April/May | Page 31

FEATURE The upper tier members would share the cost of this action equally. And by pooling the cost of legal action we allow this strategy to become accessible to all the members and create another more significant disincentive to operators that are not willing to respect the nature of the affiliate relationship. Previous attempts to instigate collective action among affiliates on these issues failed to gain traction. Why will this be any different? There have been many attempts to put together an affiliate union over the years, and in my opinion they fail because they try to dictate who affiliates can work with. Affiliates have vastly differing opinions on what makes a good partner program. If the collective starts drawing lines around which programs members cannot work with, any affiliate who has a significant investment with a ‘ruled out’ program can’t take part. To address this issue we looked to take a totally different approach. The structure we’ve put together will not place any restrictions on members in terms of which programs they can work with. And it will operate via a democratic voting system, with every member having an equal say. Furthermore, only supporting members will be asked to engage in publications. What are the challenges with uniting a global affiliate industry and how do you in tend to overcome them? There is a difference between uniting a global affiliate industry and what this project looks to achieve. One of the challenges we face is the nature of affiliates, which consist of a diverse group of people with a wide ThePOGG.com Established: 2011 Key people: Duncan Garvie, manager Based: Scotland and Malta Employees: Seven spectrum of views and opinions. This is not an attempt to unify all of them. But we are looking to gather together enough affiliates of a similar viewpoint who are willing to work together to improve the rights of all members. Ideally I would envision an active membership of 50-100 affiliates. In my opinion, were we to go beyond this bracket, administration and maintaining active participation would be difficult. Less than this figure and the effectiveness of any actions we could take would start to diminish. Sky Bet’s T&Cs allowed it to shut its program down with zero notice, and most programs that affiliates have signed up with reserve the right to make similar changes. How does your group intend to deal with this? I’m wary of commenting on an individual issue as the whole premise behind this project would be the view of the collective decides what action is taken, not the views of myself or any other individual. “Past attempts to put together an affiliate union have failed because they tried to dictate who affiliates can work with” One of the most important strategies to making a success of this project is straightforward and addressed by this interview – we need to get the idea out to affiliates. With thousands of affiliates currently active in the industry it should not be difficult to find 50-100 who believe that this project is a good idea. But the biggest obstacle to overcome here is getting the word out. So I’d like to take this opportunity to reach out and encourage any affiliate who is interested to tell your friends. Word of mouth will decide whether or not this project is successful! I think the Sky Bet closure was an example of a program using unrelated regulatory changes to dip its hands into its partners’ pockets. This shouldn’t have come as a surprise to anyone. This operator had a history of taking this type of action and had changed its revenue ladder only a couple of years ago to pay its affiliates less. It slashed affiliate incomes and got away with it. Why wouldn’t it just stop paying affiliates altogether? The biggest strength affiliates have is their traffic. Operators want their brand exposed to that traffic. But this can work in reverse too. The last thing iGB Affiliate Issue 68 APR/MAY 2018 27