HPE HPE 90 – November 2018 | Page 8

opinion Thinking the unthinkable Poisoning with nerve agents and mustard gas are unthinkable horrors but particulate contamination of intravenous fluids can also present insidious dangers, according to speakers at the 2018 GERPAC conference Measures to treat the immediate and long-term effects of chemical warfare agents are still important today, because chemical attacks represent excellent value for money for terrorist groups, according to Colonel Dr Christophe Piérard, a pharmacist who works in the French military biomedical research institute. Accidental exposure to sulphur mustard (mustard gas) still occurs occasionally due to release from gas shells left over from the First World War. It has also been used more recently in conflicts in Iraq and Syria. During the First World War casualties were numerous and there was no treatment other than supportive measures, but now understanding has advanced and new treatments are emerging. Today, decontamination using Fuller’s earth (or flour or talc) and copious quantities of water remains the most critical measure, but it can be a slow process. Sulphur mustard is odourless and colourless and rapidly penetrates the human body through skin and mucous membranes causing blistering and irritation. Its parent compound forms highly reactive episulphonium ions that alkylate nucleic acids and proteins causing cell death. Although the mortality is estimated to be about 2%, there is often long-term damage to the eyes, skin and lungs and psychological damage. Neurotoxic organophosphorus agents such as sarin, VX and Novichok are irreversible cholinesterase inhibitors. Exposure results in widespread cholinergic effects including miosis, rhinorrhoea, and nausea and vomiting. Emergency treatment for combatants involves the use of an autoinjector to deliver atropine and pralidoxime (to reactivate cholinesterases). The needle should be held in for ten seconds to deliver effective doses but a common reaction is to pull it out quickly because of the pain of injection. Furthermore, pralidoxime penetrates the blood–brain barrier poorly and so damage to the central nervous system 8 | Issue 90 | 2018 | hospitalpharmacyeurope.com Christine Clark PhD FRPharmS FCPP(Hon) can be a serious complication. Better cholinesterase reactivators and bio-scavenger enzymes to capture nerve agents are needed. New approaches to sulphur mustard poisoning include local cooling to reduce the vesicant effects and give time for repair enzymes to take effect. Another approach is the use of anti- connexin-43 because down-regulation of connexin-43 favours wound healing. The risk of military use of chemical agents is moderate but the terrorist threat is high, according to experts. “Prepare for the unthinkable”, was Dr Piérard’s message. Particulate contamination Particulate contamination of injectable drugs is probably a more common problem than many people realise. Injected particles are associated with clinical complications that can include phlebitis, granuloma formation, arterial embolism, immune modulation, impaired microcirculation, and even death. Paediatric patients receiving multiple intravenous doses are at particular risk because of the small volumes in which they have to be administered. Commercially manufactured injectable medicines have low particle counts but the way that they are handled can lead to considerable contamination, explained Pascal Odou, a pharmaceutical scientist at the University of Lille, France. Types of containers and devices, speed of administration, chemical incompatibilities and ambient temperature can all contribute to particle formation. For example, an administration manifold with three– four taps at 90 degrees to the direction of flow results in considerable flow disruption when doses are injected. Furthermore, simply adding an extension line to an intravenous administration set greatly increases the particle count. Glass ampoules present the biggest risk – producing particles of up to 400 micrometres, 83% of which can be removed by using an in-line filter. Syringes and administration tubing can also be sources of particles. There are numerous chemical incompatibilities that can result in precipitation of particles and although filtration will remove many of them, there can be appreciable particulate contamination before it is visible to the human eye. Multichannel administration devices can reduce particulate contamination. For example, studies in children receiving stem cell allografts showed a large reduction in the number of particles administered when a multichannel device was used instead of the traditional system. Such devices should be positioned as near to the patient as possible to minimise the time available for potentially incompatible drugs to mix before entering the bloodstream. Particulate contamination of injectable drug solutions remains a real problem in the care of seriously ill patients. Measures to minimise the number of particles in injected fluids include the avoidance of known incompatibilities and careful choice of administration devices and protocols. However, all of these require an understanding of the problems in the first place and for pharmacists, this should go hand in hand with knowledge of the pharmacology of the drugs.