Hooo-Hooo Volume 9, Nr 4 | Page 8

WildLife Group of the SAVA A Decade of Changes and Challenges in Wildlife Diagnostic Pathology Dr Rick Last – BVSc; M.Med.Vet (Pathology) Specialist Veterinary Pathologist Introduction Disease Diagnosis Compare this to the number of delegates at the biennial SAVA Congress (±300) and RuVasa Congress (±190) and one can see that it is becoming a significant component of our profession in Southern Africa. Post mortem examination has become an extremely important skill set required by the wildlife veterinarian to remain relevant in this ever changing industry. It is absolutely imperative that all wildlife veterinarians ensure that they have correct equipment required at their disposal at all times to perform a thorough post mortem. Over the past decade there has been a quantum shift in the African wildlife industry with an exponential growth in the demand for the inputs and expertise of veterinarians in the fields of animal health, preventative medicine, production performance, reproduction and economic performance. The relevance and significance of African wildlife to our profession is highlighted by the number of delegates attending the SAVA Wildlife Group Annual Congress, which has grown from around 50 delegates in 2011 to just short of 140 delegates in 2015. At the recent Workshop on Veterinary Specialisation in South Africa attended by key role players including Faculty of Veterinary Science, South African Veterinary Council, South African Veterinary Association, Onderstepoort Veterinary Institute, Department of Agriculture and Industry among others, African Wildlife specialisation was identified at the one area where Africa and in particular South Africa, needs to take the lead in becoming the world reference centre. Against this background there has been a growing realisation as to the invaluable contribution of investigative diagnostic pathologist in the spheres of disease diagnostics, disease investigation and disease monitoring. 8 With the shift from conservation to wildlife production driven by the economic value of certain species, disease free status of animals and the ever growing array of colour variants, we have seen a change in the type of submissions we see at the laboratory over the past decade. Individual animal disease investigation and treatment has become routine with a growing number of surgical biopsy specimens, which are used to assist in the selection of treatment protocols, being received at the laboratory. With the value of some these wildlife species the risk of litigation has grown significantly and insurance companies are becoming more and more stringent about the details of pathology reports before pay outs are made. We as a profession have a duty to the animals we work on and the industries we serve to provide the best possible chance, under the circumstances, for a diagnosis. However, we at the laboratory still receive a significant number of submissions where it is quite obvious that the post mortem examination has been rather cursory and only a limited number of tissue specimens submitted. Be very careful as you can bet your