HHE 2018 | Página 26

Could you present us the two/three expectations that your organisation/country have today on improving the quality of healthcare using the experiences and competencies of patients? Patient orientation – in that patients shall be in the focus of the decisions and actions and are enabled to take an active part – is essential in making efforts to improve quality of care. Active participation, however, requires a certain degree of personal competence and responsibility. Thus, in order to empower people to be actively involved, strengthening the health literacy of the population and vulnerable groups by appropriate measures is a declared common goal of the health reform partners over the next four years. The measures envisaged include the enhancement of independent information in the internet health portal (www.gesundheit.gv.at) on health and diseases as well as on possibilities of healthcare provision, available evidence of treatment options, and on the functioning of the healthcare system. Additionally, there will be standards developed on how written information on health denmark Mrs Eva M. Weinreich-Jensen HOPE President, Danish Regions Could you outline the strategy/approach adopted in your country on quality and patient safety or the two/three initiatives in the hospital and healthcare sector in the past ten years? Quality and patient safety are very important in the Danish Quality approach. Denmark established the National Quality Programme in 2016. It aims explicitly at building a nationwide improvement culture through eight national targets and a number of indicators, interdisciplinary collaborations and a national leadership programme. The approach is based on a close cooperation among the State, the regions and the municipalities. The goal is putting patients first and improving the results for them. The programme replaced the accreditation in hospital and pre-hospital settings. Each hospital and region set their own goals in relation to the overall national targets based on the challenges they face. National learning initiatives and collaborations are established, with the aim of improving the clinical quality result in specific areas, and the experience for the patients and their relatives. In many ways, though, the work on quality was handed back to clinicians. This shall be interpreted as an act of confidence towards the health professionals and their inherent ambitions to improve clinical quality. Patient experiences became the starting point for quality improvements and optimisation of pathways issues can become most clearly understandable. In order to improve the oral communication between patients and healthcare providers and support both in being ‘partners’, healthcare providers will be trained to improve their communication skills. It was also agreed to continue the regular cross-sector surveys on patient satisfaction with the service provision in the healthcare system. The survey captures the patients’ experiences on care processes, in particular the communication and care processes at the interfaces. Data suggests that patients’ involvement in care processes may bring about an optimisation in the healthcare service provision. Surveys repeated on a regular basis allow for the monitoring of services and evaluation of improvement measures set. Patient experiences and opinions thus become the starting point for quality improvements and for the optimisation of patient pathways in the healthcare system. Could you present us the two/three expectations that your organisation/country have today on improving the quality of healthcare using the experiences and competencies of patients? Improving the quality of healthcare using the experiences and competencies of patients is a central feature of the Danish approach. Patient safety is one of the eight national targets. Some examples of initiatives implemented in this regard are the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and of surveys on patient satisfaction covering many areas of the healthcare denmark Total health expenditure as % of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) Percentage of current public expenditure on health as % of total current health expenditure Hospital current health expenditure, as % of total current health expenditure Out-of-pocket expenditure, % of current expenditure on health All hospital beds per 100,000 inhabitants Acute care hospital beds per 100,000 inhabitants Acute care admissions/discharges per 100 inhabitants Average length of stay for acute care hospitals (bed-days) Practicing physicians per 100,000 inhabitants Practicing nurses per 100,000 inhabitants 26 HHE 2018 | hospitalhealthcare.com 2000 2008 2015 8.1% 9.5% 10.3% 83.1% 84.0% 84.1% 43.7% 44.5% 44.1% 15.4% 14.1% 13.7% 429.0 357.0 253.0 426.0 351.0 246.0 15.2 13.1 n.a 3.8 n.a n.a 291.0 349.0 366.0 1237.0 1490.0 1670.0