HeadWise Volume 3, Issue 3 | Page 26

Alexander Mauskop, M.D. Professor of Clinical Neurology SUNY Downstate Medical Center Brooklyn, New York Director, New York Headache Center New York, New York This ancient Chinese treatment has been subjected to hundreds of animal studies, which have established that acupuncture may exert its effect by causing release of natural pain-relieving substances such as endorphins (endogenous morphine). This pain-relieving effect can be reversed in animals by injecting naloxone, an antidote given for narcotic overdose. Other possible mechanisms of action discovered via animal experiments are through the brain’s serotonin, histamine, and GABA systems. A very large number of clinical trials have also been performed in humans. Only a small number of these trials were rigorous and provided reliable information. A detailed review of 14 trials of acupuncture used in the treatment of recurrent headaches was published by Melchart and his colleagues in the international headache journal, Cephalalgia, in 1999. This report noted that the majority of 14 trials comparing true and sham acupuncture showed at least a trend in favor of true acupuncture. A British study, led by Vickers, evaluated the effect of acupuncture on chronic headaches in 401 patients in a primary care setting. Patients in the acupuncture group received 12 weekly treatments and the control group 26 HeadWise™ | Volume 3, Issue 3 • 2013 received the usual headache treatment. Both groups were followed for 12 months. The headache score dropped by 34% in patients receiving acupuncture versus 16% reduction in the control group. Medication use was 15% less in the acupuncture group. Several quality of life measures were better in the acupuncture group who also reported 25% fewer visits to their general practitioner. The most significant studies were funded by the German government. The first study included 302 patients with migraine who were randomly assigned to one of three groups: a group of patients who were treated with acupuncture; a group receiving sham acupuncture; and, a group of patients assigned to a waiting list for 3 months who were subsequently treated by acupuncture. The study revealed that both in the real and sham acupuncture groups about 50% of the patients responded. The responder rate in the waiting list group was only 15%. The second study was a prospective, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group, controlled, clinical trial, which is considered the most rigorous and scientific method. Patients reported 2 to 6 migraine attacks per month, and were randomly assigned to