GORV - Digital Magazine Issue #23 | Page 40

REDARC 150W SOLAR BLANKET Dometic isn’t the only company leading the portable solar charge – excuse the pun. If you’re in the market for a portable solar solution, another one to look at is Redarc’s 150W product, which has no grid lines, a solid copper backing, and Anderson plug connectivity. According to Redarc, the “unique design” of the panel’s ‘SunPower’ cells “reduces cell failure from corrosion and breakage”. Like the Dometic PSB150, it has an anti-reflective scratch-resistant coating, a high melting temperature, as well as self-cleaning non-stick resistance properties. It is also compact and lightweight, though at 6kg it is heavier than the PSB150. However, unlike the PSB150, the solar regulator, which is essential to ensure correct, safe and efficient charge, is sold separately. At a minimum, this product requires a 20A regulator. (Redarc sells a ‘20A Solar Value Pack’, which contains all of the accessories required to connect the blanket to the battery, including a 5m cable, 20A regulator, and a battery clip cable.) FAST FACTS Weight: 6kg Capacity: 150W Price: $1615.76 (solar blanket only); $249.11 for the Solar Value Pack More info: www.redarc.com.au 40 \ EASY STORAGE In comparison to fixed panels or fold-out portable panels, solar blankets are not only much lighter but easy to move and store. While portable solar devices have typically been associated with folk wishing to roll out a swag or camp in the back of a large 4WD, caravanners need not feel excluded. “The way things are going with technology, you are tending to take a lot more devices and appliances away with you,” Redarc’s Shannon Axford said. “This means you are using more power. Just three years, ago 200W of solar on the roof was plenty; these days it’s not uncommon to see rigs with 600W or more.” He said the best solution was to supplement an existing solar system with a blanket wired in parallel through a battery management system. He says ‘out of the box’ monocrystalline solar blanket technology was generally more efficient than standard glass solar panels.