gmhTODAY 26 gmhTODAY June July 2019 | Page 83

This project is in the initial stages of review but is expected to have the following impacts: • • • • • Restore Threatened Fish Species (Steelhead Trout) Improve the Delta Improve Resiliency and Emergency Water Supply Eliminate Water Quality Issues in San Luis Reservoir Reduce Flooding to Disadvantaged Communities There are a variety of partners on this project including Valley Water, San Benito County Water District, Pacheco Pass Water District, Grassland Water District, and various wildlife refuges in the San Joaquin River Hydrologic Region. With a combination of state funds (Prop 1: Water Quality, Supply and Infrastructure Improvement Act, 2014), grants and tentative commitments from partners and future water users, this project is well on its way to full funding. Project timelines are still being developed; however, 2021 is the target year for the environmental impact reports, with construction anticipated to start three years later. The entire project currently has a 10-15 year timeline. More informa- tion is available at Valley Water Pacheco Reservoir Expansion The third issue of relevance and importance to our community is maintaining affordable water rates for agriculture. Santa Clara County’s agricultural production for 2017 was over $316 million. District 1 is Valley Water’s largest district geographically and is home to most of Santa Clara Valley’s agriculture industry. Valley Water GILROY • MORGAN HILL • SAN MARTIN has questioned the water rates for agriculture and has proposed some conditions be set on reduced water rates for agriculture in the future. While this is not a major concern outside of District 1 due to the few agricultural ventures in the north, it is a major factor in our regional economy and a livelihood issue for many farmers and growers in District 1. A recent guest commentary by Mike Wade and Paul Mirassou in the Silicon Valley Business Journal puts this in perspective. “If we agree that maintaining a vibrant, thriving local food connection for Bay Area residents is important, then we think the current policy that grants lower water rates for working farms without burdensome mandates is still the best way to go.” John Varela, District 1 — our representative, championing the preservation of reduced rates for agriculture. june/july 2019 gmhtoday.com 83