[ S U R V E Y | M U T U A L F U N D A D M I N I S T R A T I O N ]
ALPS , a DST Company
reat group of people ,” writes one mid-sized client . “ Ex- client service .” The human side of the business
“ Gcellent is an area where ALPS consistently performs well , with even the 2017 decrease in the score for relationship management and client service proving no more than a blip . It has rebounded strongly this year , with one respondent singling out their ALPS contacts for their “ responsiveness .” A second adds that the relationship management has “ done an excellent job of providing support and responding to our needs .” Feedback of this kind matters to ALPs . With all but a tiny fraction of the clients serviced by the firm , managing no more than $ 5 billion , the human touch is at least as important as the level of automation . It is an approach that wins as well as retains business . One respondent appreciates a “ willingness to spend time educating new clients on entering the mutual fund business .” Another says that staff are “ very pro-active . We are a very small shop and ALPS makes us feel like an important client .” While enthusiasm for the friendliness , responsiveness and understanding of ALPS ’ client contacts is near-universal , at least one respondent has noticed that these qualities do not always result in a rapid turnaround of queries . While acknowledging that ALPS staff are “ friendly and helpful ,” and that the firm has “ good depth of coverage on most issues ,” he finds that it “ can sometimes be hard to reach and / or get a quick response .” Yet no one could accuse ALPS of failing to keep abreast of a changing marketplace and regulatory environment . The Securities and Exchange Commission ( SEC ) launched its liquidity-risk-management-and-fund-reporiting modernisation initiative in October 2016 , with the aim of enhancing investor protection . Since then , ALPS has used the opportunity to invest time and money in developing new procedures and services to help asset managers comply by a string of deadlines set by the regulator , which stretch out to 1 March 2020 . The firm earns its reward in robust scores for compliance in general , and a handsome one for responsiveness to regulatory changes in particular . Even value , inevitably under pressure as compliance services translate into new and rising fees for clients , has recovered from the sharp fall of last year . In fact , there are only two service areas where ALPS secures returns that are less than excellent , and all fields that saw scores dip last year have recovered in 2018 , with two exceptions . One is transfer agency . “ TA may be overworked or under trained ,” writes one respondent . But there is nothing negative in client perceptions of the capabilities of the firm in the adjacent field of distribution support . “ ALPS does a great job at reviewing intermediary agreements and explaining distribution-related topics to clients ,” writes a respondent . Reporting is the other service area that failed to rise . And if ALPS has an area in discernible need of investment it lies here . One respondent avers that a “ more-enhanced direct shareholder portal ” is needed . ALPS needs no encouragement to invest in technology . As befits an administration business owned by a technology vendor ( reinforced by the SS & C acquisition of DST this spring ), it expects to increase its levels of automation through robotics . By lowering costs , automation will certainly help ALPS and its clients cope with the mounting downward pressure on fees in the asset management industry . And if those gains can be purchased without imperilling a strong reputation for being client focused , the firm will own an unbeatable combination of efficiency and service . “ ALPS is very transparent and honest in all dealings ,” concludes one respondent . “ Staff has a high degree of integrity and responsiveness . Their infrastructure is strong and cross communications are good .”
By size
7.10 %
78.60 %
14.30 %
PROFILE OF RESPONDENTS
Small Medium Large
90.00 % 80.00 % 70.00 % 60.00 % 50.00 % 40.00 % 30.00 % 20.00 % 10.00 % 0.00 %
By investment
78.60 %
28.60 %
7.10 %
Equity Fixed income Other
Weighted average scores |
|
+/ - 2017-2018 |
2018 |
2017 |
2016 |
Relationship management and client service |
0.21 |
6.30 |
6.09 |
6.42 |
Value delivered |
0.27 |
5.83 |
5.56 |
6.12 |
Fund accounting |
0.30 |
6.50 |
6.20 |
6.72 |
Transfer agency |
-0.13 |
6.08 |
6.21 |
6.50 |
Distribution support |
0.28 |
6.37 |
6.09 |
6.42 |
Reporting |
-0.07 |
6.32 |
6.39 |
6.63 |
Compliance |
0.00 |
6.42 |
6.42 |
6.51 |
Operations and custody |
-0.54 |
5.97 |
6.51 |
6.37 |
Total |
0.09 |
6.27 |
6.18 |
6.46 |
Weighted average scores versus the global averages |
|
2018 |
2017 |
2016 |
Relationship management and client service |
5.7 % |
-3.1% |
2.3 % |
Value delivered |
-0.9% |
-8.8% |
2.0 % |
Fund accounting |
7.6 % |
-3.5% |
5.8 % |
Transfer agency |
-4.3% |
-5.3% |
1.2 % |
Distribution support |
1.8 % |
-0.8% |
0.2 % |
Reporting |
5.4 % |
2.7 % |
6.8 % |
Compliance |
1.2 % |
-2.2% |
3.4 % |
Operations and custody |
2.7 % |
5.2 % |
3.0 % |
Total |
3.3 % |
-1.8% |
3.1 % |
74 Global Custodian Summer 2018