Global Custodian Summer 2017 | Page 36

[ M A R K E T R E V I E W | T E C H N O L O G Y ] “There is not a massive amount of an- alytics being used here because they are not profit generating places,” says Virginie O’Shea, research director, Aite Group. “You’re not getting rid of people with robots because the technology is very expensive—until this comes down in price and is offered by big household vendors it won’t happen.” A relationship business Robotisation has been a subsidiary focus in securities services because of its lack of contribution to strategic processes which remain very much reliant on the input of human beings and the ability to build relationships. “Relationships are always going to be an important factor in sustaining business and business growth,” says Mark John, head of product and business develop- ment for EMEA at Pershing. “Automation allows for that shortening of the settle- ment cycle, which in turns allows for re- ducing risks. However, the impact of hu- man resources is felt in the middle-office, where relationships with counterparties are essential in expediting any post-trade anomaly to ensure that settlement occurs on time.” Perhaps the steepest and potentially most dramatic upheaval to the finance “Blockchain could certainly help automate some components of the settlement process such as reconciliation and corporate actions.” JEFF CONWAY, CHIEF EXECUTIVE, EMEA, STATE STREET business is now coming with the intro- duction of artificial intelligence (AI) into the custodial and asset servicing world. Human roles are under more pressure in processes where machines can usurp functions which require thought or deci- sion-making aptitude. Chris Rowland, global head of custody, JP Morgan, says that the bank has already been looking to leverage the benefits of machine learning and AI to enable pro- cessing of more complex algorithm-based transactions. “Robots can help with enhanced process automation, creating systems that lever- age learning capabilities for judgment orientated tasks in areas like fax and trade file management,” he says. We come in peace Others like State Street have been collab- orating with investment firms to use AI in the investment process. Earlier this year, State Street launched a project with Axa Investment Managers and MKT Medi- aStats, to find technology which evaluates data-driven indicators to help analyse economic and market information within the investment process. Many believe that the potential for a robotic revolution should not be viewed as a threat but as a positive for the whole industry. But potentially those who voted against the usurpation of their roles by robots might have been swayed by the lack of an immediate threat to their roles. According to O’Shea, machine learning and artificial intelligence needs a certain amount of industrialisation before it can be fully embraced by the financial services industry—and this will take some time to implement. “If you’re going to apply industrialised technology you need it to be fully indus- trialised and standardised,” she says. “You can’t have everyone doing different things it needs to be homogeneous.” Despite the focus on it, robotisation in finance is still not at a stage where it is likely to cause too many people working in the business to have sleepless nights. Key attributes like relationship-manage- ment and creative intelligence have not yet been replicated by robots. Change is coming—but it seems to be more of a long-term evolution than the robotic rev- olution being spoken of in the media.