Geopolitics Magazine March - April 2016 | Page 74

of them; Failures come as unpleasant surprises. They are unexpected and do not belong in the system. Failures are introduced to the system only through the inherent unreliability of people. This persistence into the notion that “Bad Apples” do exist and they are sharing negative attitudes toward consistent behavior or that their problem is a personal or motivational one, an issue of mere individual choice, forces people think that by throwing out the Bad Apples, all problems will be solved. They are the same people that do believe that by adding more technology in our lives they are helping human error to be removed. Unfortunately, they cannot see that their “perfect solution” does not remove the potential for mistakes. It just relocates it or changing its nature. The Germanwings Final Accident Report A few days ago, nearly one-year after the devastatin g accident that claimed the lives of 150 passengers on board a Germanwings Flight destined from Barcelona to Düsseldorf, BEA (The French Authority for Air Accident Investigation) had published the Final Accident Report. According to this report Causes to the accident were the following: “The Collision with the ground was due to the deliberate and planned action of the co-pilot who decided to commit suicide while alone in the cockpit. The process for medical certification of pilots, in particular self-reporting in case of decrease in medical fitness between two periodic medical evaluations, did not succeed in preventing the co-pilot, who was experiencing mental disorder with psychotic symptoms, from exercising the privilege of his license.” Complimentary to the causes of the accident the report referred to other factors that may have contributed to the failure: “The co-pilot’s probable fear of losing his ability to fly as a professional pilot if he had reported his decrease in medical fitness to an AME; (Specialized doctor who is eligible to decide for the medical fitness for pilots) The potential financial consequences generated by the lack of specific insurance covering the risks of loss of income in case of unfitness to fly; The lack of clear guidelines in German regulations on when a threat to public safety outweighs the requirements of medical confidentiality.” Lastly some ink had been consumed to attribute the effective cockpit door design to security requirements that had managed to resist forcible intrusion by unauthorized persons so far, but at least in two occasions it failed to stop an accident from happening, I am referring to both the Germanwings and secondly to HELIOS accident, as in the latter sight in the cockpit area had been deprived, which had led pilots enter “hypoxia state” first and left as impossible the opportunity for anyone being able to tackle “piloting” earlier. Within the conclusions area of the report had been stated that: “the co-pilot did not contact any AME;” (probably it refers that the co-pilot did not voluntarily had revealed to an AME that he was taking medication prescriptions for anti-depression mitigation that would had led to losing his flight license. “the mental state of the co-pilot did not generate any reported concern from the pilots flew with him;” “no health care providers reported any aeromedical concerns to authorities.” Geopolitics.com.gr all rights reserved 2016 Page 72