GeminiFocus June 2012 | Page 9

Figure 2. A comparison of ellipticity and Sersic index distributions from local early-type galaxies (contours) with those of the high-redshift massive compact galaxies published in van der Wel et al. (2011, black filled triangles) and Damjanov et al. (2011, black stars). Contours are normalized and smoothed, increasing in number density from yellow to red in logarithmic steps. Different panels show changing mass ranges for the local earlytype galaxy sample, denoted in the upper right corner or each panel. The last panel (lower right) shows the distribution for local massive diskdominated galaxies. Figure taken from Chevance et al., 2012. 9 Until recently, we assumed that these ultracompact objects are early-type galaxies — elliptical systems, shrunken in size by a factor of three, while retaining their overall mass. This seemed like a fairly safe assumption, and in some ways likely, because elliptical galaxies are not only pretty massive, as the objects seen seem, but also appear structureless, as do ellipticals. However, there are growing indications that this may actually be a bad assumption — after all, the galaxies are so compact that even if they harbored lots of interesting substructure, we would not resolve it with the Hubble Space Telescope (HST). This is a nice argument, by the way, for imaging these objects with Gemini’s new Multi-Conjugate Adaptive Optics system. Furtheremore, recent deep, high-resolution images taken with the HST’s Wide Field Camera 3 and Near-Infrared Camera 2 have shown, based on observed ellipticities and Sersic profile fits, that some of these compact, high-redshift galaxies may contain disks. Indeed, based on a sample of 14 quiescent, ultra-compact galaxies, van der Wel et al. (2011) claim that disks dominate the majority of these systems. GeminiFocus To investigate this claim, we compared the ellipticity distribution of 31 carefully selected quiescent, ultra-compact galaxies to a set of mass-selected ellipticity and Sersic index distributions (obtained from 2D structural fits to ~ 40,000 nearby galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey). A Kolmogorov-Smirnov test shows that the distribution of ellipticities for the high-redshift galaxies is consistent with the ellipticity distribution of a similarly chosen sample of massive early-type galaxies. However the distribution of Sersic indices for the high-redshift sample is inconsistent with that of local early-type galaxies, and instead resembles that of local disk-dominated populations. In other words, while the ellipticities argue for these compact galaxies being earlytype systems, their profiles argue for them being disks (Figure 2). The correct conclusion, then, seems to be that nothing works. The mismatch between the properties of high-redshift compact galaxies and those of putative local analogs leads us to conclude that the basic structures of ultra-compact galaxies probably do not closely resemble those of any single local galaxy population. Any galaxy population analog to the high-redshift compact galaxies that exists at the current ep- June2012