GeminiFocus June 2012 | Page 10

fied 850 K greybody, augmented with a mid-infrared, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon emission template spectrum, as suggested by da Cunha et al. (2008). The luminosity of the excess SED component correlates with the star-formation rate of the galaxy, so the excess shows some promise as an extinction-free star formation tracer. Figure 3. The case for hot (~ 1000 K) dust or PAH continuum emission in GDDS galaxies, based on multi-wavelength rest-frame photometry for 88 GDDS galaxies. See Mentuch et al. (2009), from which this figure is taken, for details. Observations from the Gemini Deep Deep Survey nearly always show a disagreement between purestellar models and observations at 2-5 μm. As shown in the next figure, adding an 850 K greybody+PAH line emission fit data well. Is this related to star formation, and if so, how? 10 och is either a mix of different types of galaxies, or possibly a unique class of objects. Extragalactic Circumstellar Disks? Shifting gears completely, another relatively recent result from the GDDS, and presented in a paper led by Erin Mentuch in 2009, focuses on the blue star-forming galaxies in the GDDS. Of course, we originally set out to target a totally different (quiescent) population of galaxies: the so-called red and dead galaxies. But since these systems are fairly rare, and, since one has to fill up gaps in Gemini MultiObject Spectrograph masks with something, we also targeted bluer objects when redder ones were unavailable. As it turned out, the survey did some of its most interesting work on these “runt” galaxies. Detailed modeling of the Spitzer colors of these objects (Figure 3) shows clear evidence for a near-infrared excess at around 3 microns, which, at the redshifts of these galaxies, is seen in the Infrared Array Camera (IRAC) [5.8]-micron and [8.0]-micron bands. In a nice surprise, Mentuch et al. modeled this excess as an additional Spectral Energy Distribution (SED) component consisting of a modi- GeminiFocus HST imaging data hint that the excess correlates with star-formation activity and morphology. But the main interest of the excess lies in the interpretation of its origin. The five best candidates for the excess emission are: (1) active galactic nuclei (AGN); (2) the high-redshift counterpart to the interstellar cirrus emission seen in our own galaxy, (3) reflection nebulae; (4) post-asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars/planetary nebulae; and (5) proto-stellar/proto-planetary disks in massive star-forming regions. Mentuch et al. (2009) come down firmly in favor of the last candidate, in effect attributing the excess light to the collective emission from the thousands of flared circumstellar disks around massive stars in galaxies at high redshifts