GeminiFocus April 2017 | Page 25

Although the detectors behaved well from September 2015 until June 2016, we were not out of the woods yet. Following a ther- mal cycling event of the cryostat in June 2016, a new vertical structure appeared in the bias of CCDs 2 and 3, as well as repetitive sharp horizontal lines. A few months later these structures became even stronger, now seriously affecting the science quality of the data; in particular, due to the increased noise over significant parts of the CCD array. Once again we looked for measures to minimize the effect and carried out many tests follow- ing advice from the chip manufacturer… but nothing seemed to improve the situation; it seemed desperate. LSST: Gemini South´s Neighbor Comes Closer to Reality New large telescope facilities always attract attention, and the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST), currently under construc- tion on Cerro Pachón, is no exception. In December 2016, for instance, two eminent astronomers — Ewine van Dishoeck (Pro- fessor of Molecular Astrophysics at Leiden Observatory and President-elect of the In- ternational Astronomical Union), and Eu- ropean Southern Observatory Director Tim de Zeeuw — visited both LSST and Gemini South. The images in Figures 2, 3, and 4, Figure 2. Staff and visitors inspect the LSST pier and enclosure. Then one day in February 2017 a fault on a compressor used for the cooling of GMOS- S caused the cryostat to warm up. We all feared the worst and were anxious to see the first bias frame come out of the in- strument. To everyone’s surprise, the bias looked normal, without any of the vertical banding or horizontal stripes! A Happy Ending? Well… yes and no. At this moment the detectors are performing well, and we are monitoring their behavior; but clearly something’s not right as more than once serious problems have come and gone without any clear indication why. We need to take stock of the situation and determine the best way forward. Figure 3. View of the LSST telescope enclosure from where the LSST coating plant will be located. At the time of writing, similar detectors are being installed in GMOS-N with great care to avoid the problems we identified in GMOS-S; all tests carried out to date show no indication of prob- lems with detector bias. April 2017 GeminiFocus 23