GeminiFocus 2018 Year in Review | Page 12

Figure 2. Half-light radius versus stellar mass for galaxies with photometric redshifts 2 half-light radius versus stellar mass for galaxies with photometric redshifts 2 < z < 4. Red symbols indicate objects best fit with de Vaucouleurs profiles and blue symbols objects best fit by exponential disks. Objects from the CANDELS survey by HST are shown as faint dots. Stars indicate the host galaxies of starbursts detected by Herschel. The dotted cyan line indicates the resolution of HST, and the dot-dashed black line shows that of GeMS/GSAOI. Note that the estimates from the Gemini data tend towards smaller sizes at a given stellar mass than those from HST. As a pilot program, we observed three of these fields (including ES1C; Figure 1, previ- ous page) with GeMS/MCAO for between 30 and 90 minutes each (Lacy et al., 2018). The resulting images have limiting magnitudes of 24-24.6 and resolutions (Full-Width at Half-Maximum of the PSF) of 0.07-0.16 arc- second, depending on the integration time and observing conditions. What Can We Learn From Higher Resolution? Galaxy sizes (at a fixed stellar mass) are seen to grow rapidly with cosmic time from z ~ 2 to z ~ 1. The mechanism for this is currently the subject of debate, though mergers are likely to play an important role. The smaller Gemini PSF allows more accurate estimates of the sizes of the most compact galaxies (those with scale sizes < 1 kpc) than previ- ously possible. At z < 2, we obtained results on galaxy sizes as a function of stellar mass that are similar to those from studies with the HST (e.g., the CANDELS survey, van der Wel et al., 2014). At z < 2, however, we see evidence of a higher fraction of compact star-forming galaxies (Figure 2). Although this needs to be confirmed by obtaining higher signal-to-noise profiles from deeper observations, this could imply an even more extreme size evolution in the galaxy popula- tion than currently assumed. In the GeMS fields there are several sources detected in the far-infrared HerMES survey (which used the Herschel Space Observatory). At the redshifts we are seeing them (z ~ 1-3), they correspond to ultraluminous infrared galaxies (ULIRGs). In the local Universe, the far-infrared emission from ULIRGs is typically powered by starbursts and AGN. To obtain redshift estimates, and to disentangle the contribution of these two power sources, we used multiwavelength data from surveys in the optical and infrared, as well as new ra- dio continuum data from the Australia Tele- scope Compact Array and Very Large Array. The ULIRGs we identify consist of a combi- nation of pure starburst galaxies and com- posite AGN/starburst objects. We find that the ULIRGS with strong AGN tend to reside in hosts with smaller scale sizes than purely star-forming galaxies of similar infrared lu- minosity. Like their local counterparts, the ULIRGs in this study seem to show signs of recent merger activity, such as highly disturbed morphologies. We also find a candidate triple AGN system (Figure 3), which consists of three AGN with photometric red- shifts of z = 1.4 (spectroscopic red- shifts are required to confirm the triple AGN system): one is a radio- loud AGN, suggesting the presence of radio jets and lobes; one is a Type- 2 AGN, showing both narrow and broadened optical spectral emis- sion lines; and one is a Type-1 AGN, showing narrow emission lines only (though still wider than emission lines in normal galaxies). Both the 10 GeminiFocus January 2019 / 2018 Year in Review