GEMA/HS Dispatch June 2018 Edition | Page 19

t 'enhanced' plan for federal approval Above: Representatives from a variety of state agencies discuss implications of Georgia's top hazards such as severe weather, tornadoes and extreme heat. Left: After discussing the top action items that might come about as a result of each hazard, attendees cast their votes for which item their agency considers to be most important. This allows Hazard Mitigation Planners to better understand what concerns the state as a whole, and therefore build out their plans, which will be submitted to FEMA later this year. (Photos by Julia Regeski.) complete and the governor has signed off on the plan’s adoption, the document is then ready to be submitted to FEMA, who reviews it, provides feedback, and returns the plan so the state can make any needed changes. Despite the lengthy drafting process, completing a thorough, high-quality hazard mitigation plan remains a priority for the agency because it means more help for the state as a whole. “When we have a disaster, local governments want money to help them recover from the disaster. State agencies want to be reimbursed for their damages and their support of operations,” said Lunn. With everything from tornadoes to earthquakes named as potential risks for the state of Georgia, creating a strategic hazard mitigation plan to reduce or even eliminate the risk to human life and property is considered crucial – perhaps now more than ever. DISPATCH