GACP 1st Quarter Newsletter 2018-1st Quarter Newsletter_Jan1 | Page 24

Chiefs’ Counsel’s Corner How to Be Ready When the EEOC Charges In 5 Five Harassment Prevention Principles to Highlight in a Response Michael A. Caldwell, JD General Counsel, GACP Delong • Caldwell • Bridgers • Fitzpatrick • Benjamin, LLC 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 NW Harassment, especially harassment based on the victim’s gender, is a hot news item lately. Harassment refers to oppressive bullying, belittling, or intimidating behavior directed at a victim perceived as less powerful than the harasser. While it is not illegal in itself, when it is based upon a person’s protected characteristic (race, color, creed, religion, gender, national origin, age [once the victim achieves 40 years], disability [if a victim is qualified for a job and disabled], membership in or status as a veteran of the US Armed Forces, or the victim’s history of exercising federally protected rights) it becomes a form of illegal discrimination. Harassment allegations once made public prompt nearly visceral repugnance in the community. Visualize the “vast left-wing conspiracy” tactics seeking to bring down various conservative broadcasters like Bill O’Reilly (vague historic allusion intended here), or even more recently, the charges that have driven movie mogul Harvey Weinstein out of his companies and into a rehabilitation clinic. Sometimes (such as is likely in Weinstein’s case), the EEOC will go far beyond the facts of the individual charging party to examine a wide swath of decisions affecting an employer’s subordinates to determine whether there is a pattern or practice of systemic violations of the anti-discrimination laws. Usually, when responding to the EEOC on an individual charge, employers can provide a precise and limited response to an EEOC unlawful harassment charge that includes only the most essential supporting documents. But, when the risk of a systemic investigation arises, an employer’s response may need to be more comprehensive to show that the individual’s charge lacks merit and that the (Continued on page 25) www.gachiefs.com • Page 24 • 1st Quarter Newsletter