Forensics Journal - Stevenson University 2013 | Page 65

STEVENSON UNIVERSITY

Giannelli, P. C. (2011, Spring). Misleading Expert Testimony. Criminal Justice Magazine, 26(1), 50-51,56.

Thompson, W. C. (2009, March 24). Beyond Bad Apples: Analyzing
The Role Of Forensic Science In Wrongful Convictions. Southwestern
University Law Review, 37, 1028-1050.

Goldstein, R. M. (2011). Improving Forensic Science Through State
Oversight. Texas Law Review, 90(225), 225-258.

Turvey, B. E. (2009, February 25). The NAS Report on Forensic Science: A Forensic Scientist’s response. Crime Reconstruction, 1-17.

Koppl, R. (2007). CSI for Real: How To Improve Forensics Science.
Fairleigh Dickinson University, Institute For Forensic Science Administration. Reason Foundation.

Turvey, B. M. (2004-2008). Forensic Fraud. (Forensic Solutions
LLC) Retrieved August 27, 2012, from Forensic Solutions LLC
Forensic Fraud Archive: www.corpus-delicti.com

Kurland, M. (2009). Irrefutable Evidence. Chicago, IL, USA: Ivan R.
Dee.

BROOKE BRVENIK received her Bachelor
of Science Degree in Communication from
the University of South Florida (Tampa) in
1992. She has over ten years of experience
in the Telecommunications and Information
Technology sectors, working in Sales and
Sales Management. Currently, she is enrolled
as a Forensic Studies Graduate student at
Stevenson University, studying both Law and
Investigations on the interdisciplinary track.
In addition, she volunteers as an Investigative
Intern at the Baltimore City Office of the
Public Defender.

National Research Council. (2009). Strengthening Forensic Science In
The United States. The National Academy of Science, Committee on
Identifying The Needs Of The Forensic Science Community. Washington D.C.: The National Academies Press.
Office of Inspector General. (1997). The F.B.I. Laboratory: An Investigation Into Laboratory Practices and Alleged Misconduct in ExplosivesRelated and Other Cases. Executive Summary, U.S. Department Of
Justice, Inspector General.
Office of the Inspector General. (2004). The FBI DNA Laboratory:
A Review of Protocol and Practice Vulnerabilities. Executive Summary,
U.S. Department of Justice, Office of the Inspector General, Washington D.C.
Pyrek, K. M. (2007). Forensic Science Under Seige. Burlington, MA,
USA: Elsevier Academic Press.
Richardson, T. (2003, June 5). The Topeka Capital Journal. Retrieved
September 28, 2012, from CJonline.com: www.cjonline.com/stories/060503/bre_kbi.shtml
Risinger, M., Saks, M. J., Thompson, W. C., & Rosenthal, R. (2002).
The Daubert/Kumho Implications Of Observer Effects in Forensic
Science: Hidden Problems of Expectation and Suggestion. California
Law Review, 90, 1-56.
Salecl, R. (2011, Fall). Perversion and Forensic Science: Fraudulent
Testimonies. Social Research An International Quarterly, 78(3), 887906.
Schmidt, K. K. (2011, January 31). Propublica. Retrieved from Propublica.org: www.proppublica.org
Schmidt, K., & Shaw, A. B. (2011, January 31). ProPublica. Retrieved
from Propublica.com: www.propublica.com
Thompson, W. C. (2006, January). Tarnish On The “Gold Standard”:
Understanding Recent Problems In Forensic DNA Testing. The
Champion.

64