Fix School Discipline Toolkit for Educators | Page 8
THE GOOD NEWS:
THERE ARE EFFECTIVE ALTERNATIVES THAT KEEP SCHOOLS SAFE WHILE
HOLDING STUDENTS ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR BEHAVIOR
There are proven alternatives that can help students
behave appropriately and hold them accountable for
their actions while supporting their full development
and making schools better places for all students
to learn. There is also a practical reason to adopt a
research-based alternative: alternatives can increase
school funding because they result in higher student
attendance and lower suspension rates.
It is important to note that many schools that are
successfully reducing suspensions and improving
school climate use a multifaceted approach by
layering more than one approach. For examples,
see the SWPBIS factsheet and highlights on
Pioneer High, Vallejo City Unified and Leataata
Floyd Elementary later in this toolkit. Here is an
overview of a few school-wide solutions that are
being implemented successfully in California and
nationwide.
growth. 2
Restorative
Practices,
which build
Do to...
Do with...
Punitive
Restorative upon
Restorative
Justice and
apply it in the
school context,
Not do...
Do for...
are used to
Neglectful
Permissive
build a sense
of school
LOW -- SUPPORT (ENCOURAGEMENT, NATURE)HIGH
community
and resolve
conflict by repairing harm and restoring positive
relationships through the use of regular “restorative
circles” where students and educators work together
to set academic goals, develop core values for the
classroom community and resolve conflicts.
-- CONTROL (LIMIT-SETTING, DISCIPLINE)HIGH
Every young person has the right to a high quality
education and to learn in a safe, respectful school
environment that protects human dignity. Research
shows that punitive, zero-tolerance approaches to
discipline do not prevent or reduce misbehavior or
even make schools safer. To the contrary, they have
significant negative impacts on learning and can
make schools less safe and effective.
Proof Restorative Justice works to hold students
accountable and keep them in school
A UC Berkeley study of a Restorative Justice
program at Cole Middle School in Oakland showed
an 89% drop in suspensions from 2006-2007.3
Restorative Justice is an approach originally used in
the justice system that emphasizes:
At Richmond High School in West Contra
Costa Unified School District, as reported by
New American Media, a 2011 Restorative School
Discipline Program had cut the school’s nearly 500
suspensions by January 2011 in half by January
2012.4 In 2013-14, the school had 167 suspensions.
(1) repairing harm, (2) bringing together all affected
to collaboratively figure out how to repair harm,
and (3) giving equal attention to community safety,
victims’ needs, and offender accountability and
West Philadelphia High School was on the state’s
“Persistently Dangerous Schools” list for six years.
After one year of implementing Restorative Justice,
the climate improved dramatically: suspensions
1 Some experts believe that there is a difference between Restorative Justice (RJ) and Restorative Practices (RP); they perceive RJ to be a
restorative model for juvenile or criminal justice settings and RP to be a
restorative model for school settings. Throughout this toolkit, the authors
interchangeably use Restorative Practices and Restorative Justice, to refer
to restorative discipline strategies used in schools.
3 San Francisco Unified School District’s Restorative Practices
training;Thelton E. Henderson Center for Social Justice, University of
California Berkeley, School of Law (Boalt Hall) (2010), School-based Restorative Justice as an Alternative to Zero-Tolerance Policies: Lessons from
West Oakland.
4 Lumpkins, D. & Marshall, M. (02/28/2012), Suspensions at Richmond
High Plummet, New America Media available at http://newamericamedia.
org/2012/02/suspensions-at-richmond-high-plummet.php.
Restorative Justice or Restorative
Practices1
6
How we can fix school discipline