Firestopping Book Firestopping Book | Page 109

■ ■ ■ ■ Item 8: Fire-resistive joint systems may be eliminated where openings are allowed within a fire-resistance-rated roof assembly. In general, Section 712.1.15 will allow unprotected openings through a fire-resistive roof assembly since the code does not address fire spreading from the building to the outdoors. However, several provisions-such as Exceptions 2, 3 and 4 in Section 706.6, Exception 4 in Section 705.11, Section 706.6.1 and others will prohibit roof openings in certain locations. Item 9: Section 715 is not intended to regulate joints installed in assemblies that are provided to control shrinkage cracking and evaluated as a part of the overall assembly’s fire-resistance test. Examples of such control joints are the limited-depth saw-cut control joint in concrete and some of the control joint systems used within the face layer of stucco systems. These types of joints are made in an assembly so that cracks in the surface occur at specific points along a straight line and not randomly across the finished surface. Construction joints, such as the stopping and starting points for two successive concrete pours or control joints, which are intended to prevent shrinkage cracking (such as saw-cut control joints) in concrete or masonry, typically accommodate very little movement or may not go through the complete depth of the assembly’s protection. Therefore, Item 9 in the exception does not require compliance with ASTM E 1966 or UL 2079, as referenced in Section 715.3, but instead permits control joints with a maximum joint width of 5/8 inch to be tested in accordance with ASTM E 119 or UL 263. This allowance reflects fire test data that has existed since the 1960s regarding control and perimeter relief joints in fire- rated systems, the performance of these systems in the field and a rational approach regarding minor movement (defined here as a maximum of 5/8 inch) where no appreciable damage or fatigue is incurred by the joint system. Since all buildings move slightly, it is not prudent to have to cycle and test joint systems that only move a few millimeters. 109