4.
Value for Money Metrics – 2017/18
The revised Regulatory Standard requires providers to assess performance against seven key value for money metrics. Performance
is required to be measured both in the context of:
n How providers performed against targets set; and
n How providers performed compared with peer organisations.
Benchmarking against both Accord’s own historic performance and also against nine other peer organisations is summarised
below. An assessment on performance against targets has also been provided for each of the metrics.
Peer organisations selected are those with similar levels of income earned from supported housing and similar activities.
Benchmarking performance data has been taken from information published by HouseMark. Peer group organisations included in
the benchmarking exercise are summarised below:
Registered Provider
% income from
supported housing
Units owned and
managed
Accord Housing Association (2017 & 2018 data) 17% 12,804
Nottingham Community Housing Association (2017 data) 15% 9,226
Trident Housing Association (2017 data) 13% 3,169
Anchor Trust (2017 data) 96% 28,470
Grand Union Housing Group (2017 data) 23% 11,320
Housing & Care 21 (2017 data) 82% 19,581
Black Country Housing Group (2017 data) 20% 1,968
East Midlands Housing Group (2017 data) 26% 18,913
South Yorkshire Housing Association (2017 data) 29% 5,760
Hanover Housing Association (2017 data) 96% 13,813
Peer organisations have been anonymised in benchmarking outcome and the order in which organisations appear in the table
above is not representative of the referencing used in the benchmarking results published.
12
Accord Housing Association