Farming Monthly National September 2017 | Page 25

| Potatoes Maris Piper still king but growers use new varieties to meet retail demand British potato growers have planted an increased area of emerging varieties to serve the fresh packing market, amid reports of increased levels of ‘on-contract’ supermarket supply where prices are agreed in advance. owever, Maris Piper comfortably remains the most planted potato, with three times more area than the next most popular fresh packing variety. The varieties that have gained the most area this season are fresh packing potatoes Nectar and Melody, which increased their area by 1,000 hectares (ha) and 700 ha respectively. Both are more recent introductions to the UK market than Estima, which has decreased in area by an estimated 400 ha this season. AHDB Potatoes Market Intelligence Analyst, Amber Cottingham said: “The packing market has seen another increase in area this season, with acreage intended for processing declining once more. This may be due to a reported increase in contracts offered in the packing H market as retailers seek to reduce the financial fluctuations they encounter in meeting demand. “There continues to be some changes in the top 10 list, as newer varieties designed to suit today’s needs – both at an agronomic and consumer level – continue to increase in popularity. Likewise, some of the biggest losers this year are older varieties, which are being replaced by newer alternatives.” Results were announced in the AHDB Potatoes Area by Variety Estimate, released today (30 August). Overall the area planted that is intended to supply the fresh retail sector has increased for the second year in a row to an estimated 38 per cent of the total planted area in Great Britain, while the area planted to serve the processing sector has decreased, also for the second year running, to 29 per cent. Amber Cottingham said: “Area changes can be closely linked to the price paid the previous season. For the packing sector, this has likely had an impact, as many prices were favourable during the 2015/16 and much of the 2016/17 season, up to the point when planting decisions would have been taking place.” The estimate is produced using anonymised and aggregated data from AHDB levy return forms, which is analysed through an ISO controlled process. A full report, including area changes by region and sector, can be seen at potatoes.ahdb.org.uk CIPC and alternative UK Sprout Suppressants Due to its efficacy and modest cost, CIPC has been the sprout suppressant of choice on a global level for over fifty years. Regulatory pressures in the UK, and the stewardship response, has reduced the amount of CIPC available, which has resulted in a resurgence of interest in alternatives. esearch carried out at AHDB’s Sutton Bridge Crop Storage Research has been looking into alternatives, which are at various stages of the regulatory process. Adrian Briddon, Senior Scientist at Sutton Bridge, said: “For the fresh potato sector, I think we have become less dependent on CIPC over recent years and official government figures show some of the alternatives are being used. “For the processing sector though, this regulatory pressure is causing the most problems, because the scope of alternatives is more limited, and cost is more critical. Maleic hydrazide, applied in the field is being used more generally across the industry, which is helped by the benefit of volunteer control. “However, ethylene and spearmint oil have only really achieved success in the fresh potato sector so far. While alternative sprout suppressants may not be considered as effective, their use in combination with CIPC may be more effective than just the sum of the parts i.e. synergy. Results of Glyn Harper’s work on CIPC with ethylene threw up some interesting outcomes and is now of particular interest. How we use Sprout Supplements R www.farmingmonthly.co.uk Most of the new alternative sprout suppressants are volatile, oily liquids and one is a gas. These compounds each require a different store management approach and a specific understanding of the application conditions required. Because of a loss of apical dominance, treatments can have a modifying effect on stem numbers and some are being used successfully in seed management. In addition, some of the essential oils are also reported to control some pathogens. Because they form vapour in store, many of the new sprout suppressants need longer store closure periods after application, to ensure complete ‘uptake’ of products. In many cases 24 hours is likely to be a minimum label requirement, so for processing stores, different types of equipment are likely to be used. The new products tend to be more dynamic compounds, being gases and vapours. This may mean applications need to be more frequent, but buildings can subsequently be used for storage of other commodities and seed potatoes. This is not the case with CIPC, where a risk of cross-contamination persists for many years. September 2017 | Farming Monthly | 25