European Gaming Lawyer magazine Autumn 2016 | Page 12

VAT treatment of gambling etc for off-shore operators by Dario Garcia I n this article we conduct a review of the VAT treatment for gambling and the revenue protection measures available to Member States in the EU and in particular the approach adopted by the UK. We finish off with a short speculation on what Brexit might mean (perhaps not that much). EU Law This is found primarily in Council Directive 2006/112/EC (the VAT Directive) and Regulation 282/2001/EU on VAT (“the VAT Regulation”). Article 135.1(i) provides for the exemption of “Betting, lotteries and other forms of gambling, subject to the conditions and limitations laid down by each Member State;” The apparently very wide discretion allowed to Member States to limit the scope of exemption (limited only implicitly by the obligation on each Member State to respect the general principles of EU law, in particular prevention of distortion of competition) coupled with the unlimited freedom allowed Member States to impose other gaming and gambling duties, makes the gambling sector possibly the least harmonised of any in the EU. Notwithstanding the close fraternal relationship between EU Member States, each remains extremely jealous of its own tax base. Each is keenly aware 12 | European Gaming Lawyer | Autumn Issue | 2016 of the threat posed to its tax base by cross border shopping, within and outside the EU, particularly in the digital age which in many sectors has made this strikingly easy. One such sector is the online gambling market. EU law allows a surprising degree of national protection in a supposedly single market, particularly in the field of electronically supplied services. A consideration of the nature and effect of these protectionist measures, particularly as they affect the gambling sector, is therefore necessary. Place of supply: electronically supplied services Article 2.1(c) of the Directive subjects to VAT: “The supply of services for consideration within a Member State…” Where a supply takes place is therefore fundamental in determining the proper VAT jurisdiction. Not surprisingly, there are detailed rules for determining this. We are focusing on gambling, so it will be assumed that the consumer is a private individual acting as such. In such a case (business to consumer) or (“B2C”) the basic rule respects the “origin” principle. Accordingly Article 45 of the Directive provides: “The place of supply of services to a non taxable person shall be the place where the supplier has established his business…”