eGaming Review January 2015 | Page 52

C OV E R S T O RY / W H AT ’ S N E X T F O R E G A M I N G ? 02 w AN INCREASINGLY FRACTURED MARKET THROWS UP MORE CHALLENGES THAN OPPORTUNITIES There are few ways of achieving real step-change revenue growth, and entering newly regulated or re-regulated markets with access to mainstream marketing remains one of the most likely options for the short to mid-term revenue hikes. With little sign of regulatory progress in the US market, beyond the three states that have regulated to date, re-regulating markets across Europe remain the principle targets. Nordic-focused operators have begun expanding across Western and Central Europe, and now a growing number of UK-based firms have sought to broaden their horizons to offset the 15% hit to their bottom lines caused by the new licensing regime at home. But operators will need to look beyond Italy and Spain for the next phase of egaming. Regulus Partners’ Paul Leyland recently said he expects the number of point of consumption taxation regimes similar to that of the UK to increase. And despite the sometimes onerous tax demands, they will have no shortage of operators lining up to apply for licences, with regulated markets representing an q RE G UL AT E D E U RO P E investor-friendly, clean and reliable source of revenues. But the hard-won lessons of Italy, France and Spain have taught us it’s never going to be a simple route to profit, and newly re-regulating European markets are widely expected to be something of a bloodbath. There is now every expectation that the Dutch market, set to open its doors late next year or early 2016, will be a congested and expensive loss leader for many firms in its opening exchanges. The country’s prospective tax rate for online gambling has been set at 20% of gross profit, lower than the 29% rate at which it taxes land-based gambling, but calls for more operator-friendly conditions in the country have so far fallen on deaf ears. What is of more concern is how competitive the market looks set to be. Dutch Gaming Authority chief executive Marja Appelman has said she expects as many as 60 licence applications in anticipation for the market opening up, yet the market is not expected to be of a remarkable size with GBGC forecasting it to be worth around €388m in total gross gaming revenues by 2017. Local brands are expected to capture a considerable proportion of those revenues and with the likes of Unibet and Betsson already maintaining a strong customer base in the country, the majority of new entrants could be left fighting for scraps. The scenario is no clearer elsewhere in Europe. Germany’s online sports betting market, while of undoubted potential, seems no closer to opening after a slew of legal proceedings caused authorities in the country to halt the process for an indeterminate amount of time. With GBGC forecasting the online regulated sports betting market alone to be worth as much as €460m per annum by 2017, a regulated Germany would mean a market of huge potential for operators in receipt of a licence. But lack of regulated gaming creates more problems than sports betting licences solve. Potential might just lie in markets elsewhere. The emergence of regulation in Bulgaria and the Czech Republic, and to a lesser extent Poland, may see some of the bigger names in egaming make a return to the once promised land of Eastern Europe. Tax rates, however, will be key to any investment in the region. But perhaps a lack of regulation should not deter operators from particular markets and revenues from dot.com sites are still critical to many online gambling companies. GVC is a key example of an operator with an appetite for grey markets and investors have benefited from both increased dividends and a soaring share price in 2014. There is still considerable upside in the dot.com market for those who are willing to put aside some investor concerns, and with the rise of GVC it will be interesting to see who blinks first in 2015. There is no doubting the potential exists, but it’s a risk not everyone will be prepared to take. M A RKET PR OJE CTI O NS GERMANY (SPORTS BETTING ONLY) €49.33M (OFFSHORE: €117.55M) 2014 2014-2017 (SOURCE: GBGC) NETHERLANDS (ALL VERTICALS) €5.29M (OFFSHORE: €259.65M) 2014 €258.72M (OFFSHORE: €83.36M) €358.9M (OFFSHORE: €87.11M) 2015 2015 €332.62M (OFFSHORE: €60.07M) €413.99M (OFFSHORE: €84.79M) 2016 2016 €388.09M (OFFSHORE: €42.07M) €459.2M (OFFSHORE: €78.79M) 2017 50 2017 W W W. E G R M A G A Z I N E . C O M