EdCal EdCal v49.13 1/14/19 | Page 8

8 EDCAL January 14, 2019 Continued from page 7 assistant/vice principal ✪ Santa Barbara Unified School District—Assistant Principal, High School 2019-20 School Year ADA 14,000+, Apply by 2/25/19 at https://www.sbunified.org/departments/ human-resources/employment/openings/#management, $109,120.56-$123,133.08/yr, 215 days. Interview date: 3/15/19. Contact person: Shawn Carey, Assistant Superintendent of Secondary Education, (805)963-4338 ext. 6212, [email protected] coordinator ✪ Oakley Union Elementary School District—Extended Day Learning Center Coordinator The Extended Day Learning Center Coordinator directly supervises the employees and instruction of kindergarten through fifth grade students in the Extended Day Learning Center Program. Required: Teaching credential and Administrative Services credential. Salary: $86,392-$104,063 per year + $1,200 stipend for MA or $1,600 for Doctorate and $1,200 for state license. 205 days (12 month work calendar) Contact: Tammi Lauderdale, HR Specialist. email: [email protected]. Deadline: January 20, 2019 at 4:00 p.m. Please visit www.edjoin.org for application and additional information. CTC Continued from page 3 mediate prior to formal site visit in the fall. Common standards review Institutions are organized into cohorts that are reviewed in overlapping schedules. In Year 5 of the cycle, program sponsors submit specific documentation that indi- cates alignment with the CTC’s adopted Common Standards. Reviewers examine the documentation to determine initial alignment. Site visits In addition to determining whether standards are met, the purpose of the site visit is to evaluate the extent to which the program is effectively implemented. Purpose 1. Ensure accountability to the public and to the profession with publicly held meetings. Purpose 2. Ensure program quality by verifying that institutions addressed stipu- lations and provide technical assistance as appropriate. Purpose 3. Ensure adherence to stan- dards. Purpose 4. Foster program improve- ment. CTC-administered grant programs The Commission initiated legislative and the governor supported five state-fund- ed grant programs with the sole purpose of chipping away at critical teacher shortages. Three of the five programs focus primarily on new teacher development: California Classified School Employees Teacher Credentialing Program; Integrated Teacher Preparation Program; and California Cen- ter on Teaching Careers/CalEd. The other two programs focus on teacher recruitment, retention, and support: •  Teacher Residency Programs. •  California Classified School Employ- ee Teacher Credentialing Program. The Legislature approved $45 million for two separate rounds of funding for the California Classified School Employ- ee Teacher Credentialing Program: $20 million in 2016 and an additional $25 million in 2017. This program provides up to $4,000 per participant, per year, for up to five years. Annually, the funding provides for 2,250 annual participant grants. Integrated Teacher Preparation Program The Legislature authorized $10 million for the Integrated Teacher Preparation Pro- gram. Enabling legislation mandated that the Commission give priority to proposals for the establishment of four-year integrat- ed programs that (a) produce credentialed teachers in the areas of special education, math, science, and/or bilingual education; and (b) partner with a California Commu- nity College to develop a four-year inte- grated program of professional preparation. To analyze the impact of the Integrated Program, the legislation requires grantees to provide the CTC with program and outcome data for at least three years after receiving the grant. California Center on Teaching Careers The Tulare County Office of Education was awarded a one-time grant of $5 million to establish the Center following the com- petitive grant process implemented by the CTC. The Center’s mission is to provide collaborative leadership on a statewide level through seven regional satellite centers (county offices of education from lead office Tulare, Riverside, San Diego, Los Angeles, Sonoma, Ventura, and Shasta) dedicated to increasing the teacher workforce. Certificated assignment monitoring Assignment monitoring reports pro- vide data collected by the Commission on Teacher Credentialing from the county offices of education and address the assign- ment/mis-assignment of teachers. Districts have a limited timeframe, 30 days, to reme- dy the mis-assignment, which would result in removing the teacher from assignment and assigning an appropriately creden- tialed teacher to the group of students. This assumes of course there are credentialed teachers available. Typically, the solution is to work with the mis-assigned teacher to apply for some form of an emergency credential or receive formal board approval to continue teaching in the assignment. All emergency credentials require the teacher to demonstrate evidence of progress toward earning the appropriate credential. Failure to show evidence of progress results in the teacher being restricted from teaching in the assignment. Selected findings are provided below: •  Overall increase of 16 percent in iden- tified teaching mis-assignments for schools ranked in Deciles 1, 2 and 3 (based upon 2012 base API) when comparing the same school sites between 2015-16 and 2016-17. While there was an increase between the two years, the total number of mis-assign- ments remains less than 3 percent of the total teachers monitored. •  Special education represented the largest number of teaching mis-assign- ments by type in both years in schools ranked in the lowest three deciles. While special education mis-assignments accounts for over 30 percent of all assignments-as- signments, the number of special education mis-assignments identified for these two academic years is still significantly lower than the total number of special education mis-assignments in 2011-12 when these same school sites were first reviewed. •  English learners, representing less than one percent of the teachers who were reviewed, have been significantly reduced due to the Williams court decision yet their remains a gap with appropriately credentialed teachers working with English Language Learners. The state has revised its accountability system, however, this change has resulted in the same school sites being monitored annually since 2012. The Education Code would need to be amended legislatively in order for future assignment monitoring reports to discontinue the use of the API and begin using the revised accountabil- ity system. This is highly unlikely due to political pressure from English Language Learner and Special Education advocates. It is important to note that the teaching other ✪ Rincon Valley Union School District—Superintendent ADA 3,000, Pre-K - 8, (Sonoma County) - Competitive Compensation Package (C) Dr, Scott Mahoney, Advisor, 1000 Yulupa Avenue, Santa Rosa, CA 95405; (707) 953-3434; MahoneySearches@gmail. com; Deadline February 6, 2019, Start July 1, 2019. ✪ Small School Districts’ Association—SSDA Executive Director Responsible for overseeing administration, implementing programs, and following the strategic plan/ mission of the organization. Salary: Competitive and negotiable. Deadline: February 28, 2019 - 5:00 p.m. More information: Debra Pearson (530) 415-1152 (cell); (916) 662-7212 (office); [email protected]; www.ssda.org/jobs. More resources... Online job postings: careers.acsa.org/jobs Career resources: careers.acsa.org/jobseeker/resources mis-assignment totals in 2011-12 (8,338) and 2012-13 (5,051) when these specific school sites were first reviewed were signifi- cantly higher than the current year totals. Less than three percent of the total teachers monitored were identified as mis-assigned. This significant downward trend since these school sites were monitored in 2011 meets the intent of this focused annual monitor- ing. full credit on district salary schedules upon employment. These efforts include clarify- ing these units through modifications to the program completer transcripts high- lighting the “post graduate” units for easier editing by credential technician staff within school districts, development of a letter of clarification from the university, and notices in EdCal to inform ACSA stakeholders of the pending problem. Intern program early completion Child Development Permit When the Early Completion Option was initially enacted through legislation, there were no performance assessments in use in California. There are now three teaching performance assessment models available: •  CalTPA-developed by the Commis- sion. •  edTPA-developed by the Stanford Center for Assessment, Learning and Eq- uity (SCALE). •  Fresno Assessment of Student Teach- ing developed by California State Universi- ty, Fresno. Consequently, the Education Code must be amended to align with the Early Completion Option. The CTC is prepared to propose legislation to align the Educa- tion Code to the Early Completion Option as follows: 1) Delete the section of the Education Code that specifies what the intern pro- grams are required to do until a TPA has been developed. Rationale: The TPA has been developed and is a requirement for all Preliminary Multiple and Single Subject candidates so this portion of the code is no longer needed. 2) Amend the section of the Education Code to clearly state that once an indi- vidual passes the entry level assessment the individual must continue to take the coursework and be supported and super- vised as any other intern is until the TPA has been passed. Rationale: This will allow implementa- tion of the Commission’s direction that all interns must continue to take coursework and be supported and supervised until the time that the intern has demonstrated that he or she is ready for independent teaching practice by passing the TPA. 3) Amend the section of the Education Code that allows a candidate who does not pass the entry-level assessment to have their intern program individualized based on the results on the entry-level assessment. Rationale: The entry assessment is a single measure while the Commission’s ed- ucator preparation system relies on multiple measures to determine candidate readiness for independent teaching practice. Special Note: Program completers in existing programs are experiencing diffi- culty receiving post graduate unit credit from some school districts because the total number of units appear to be embedded within the bachelor of education transcript. ACSA Legislative Advocate Laura Preston and Doug Gephart, ACSA Liaison to the Commission on Teacher Credentialing, have been working very closely with Joan Bissell in the Chancellor’s Office to address this issue to ensure candidates will receive Since the work to update and strengthen the requirements leading to a Commis- sion-issued Child Development Permit began in 2015, several issues have emerged that include appropriate recognition, preparation, and compensation of the ECE workforce. In the last year alone, a num- ber of new reports have been published by respected entities in the field of ECE. These include, but are not limited to, the following: “Transforming the Financing of Early Care and Education” :The reports includes recommendations focused on ensuring that all families will have equal access, providing financial support for practitioners, and at- tain required qualifications and/or licensing through higher education or professional development. “Early Childhood Workforce Index 2018”: The 2018 issue tracks trends in the ECE workforce since 2016 in the areas of compensation, qualifications, educational and financial supports, work environments, and workforce data. “Getting Down to Facts 2: Current Conditions and Paths Forward for Califor- nia Schools” A national collaborative research project focused on the current condition of California’s PreK-12 education system in the areas of student success, governance, personnel, and finance. “Early Childhood Education in Califor- nia”: Deborah Stipek, author, discusses key findings including but not limited to the value of high-quality preschool for children, their families, and the public. In the last two years, ECE policy makers in California as well as across the nation have begun to better coalesce and coordinate their efforts resulting in a much stronger momentum toward change than has been seen in the past decade. Next steps for 2018-19 1. CTC staff will continue to collaborate with the field regarding the work relating to the licensing of the workforce in Califor- nia’s publicly funded Early Childhood Ed- ucation programs, and anticipates returning to the Commission at its February 2019 meeting with an analysis of the feedback from the stakeholder surveys. 2. Following the February 2019 Com- mission meeting, staff will develop a plan for next steps including an analysis of possible options for moving forward.