EDA Journal Vol 11. No.1 Winter 2018 | Page 24

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT QUARTERLY GOING GLOBAL – IEDC 2017 A PERSPECTIVE ON ‘VALUE AND RELEVANCE’ FOR AUSTRALIAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PRACTITIONERS. BY BILL MILLARD, DIRECTOR STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT, HOBSONS BAY CITY COUNCIL This article will argue that economic development professionals in Australia should consider investing some of their hard earned dollars on an IEDC Annual Conference. The International Economic Development Council is the world’s largest professional organisation for economic developers with more than 5,000 members across the United States, Canada, Europe, Australia, New Zealand, and other nations. The author has been a member of IEDC for several years and has attended three annual conferences including Toronto, Canada in September 2017. Setting aside the opportunities to visit and look ‘back of house’ at vibrant cities and regions, you will meet, eat and socialise with some great people with aligned interests, but also come home with a bag full of ideas. IEDC 2017 recently concluded in Toronto which was the first time the conference had been held outside of the United States. It was an overwhelming success attracting around 1400 participants including a few hardy souls from Australia and many from around the world. The ‘Going Global’ theme allowed me to hear about and debate, high quality job creation, revitalising communities, using creative arts to add commercial value, competitive advantage, innovation, entrepreneurship and so on. The presenters were mostly practitioners and many examples were very practical programs aiming to address issues that are faced every day in Australia. Job loss, city centre activation, changing land use, investment capital attraction and business facilitation. The keynote speaker was Dr Richard Florida who is perhaps the world’s leading ‘urbanist’. He has just released a book titled ‘The New Urban Crisis’ and also wrote ‘The Rise of the Creative Class’. He makes a strong argument for corporations to become better corporate citizens and focus on wealth sharing and a fairer economy. One of the most discussed topics is the current search going on in North America by Amazon for a second headquarters (alongside Seattle Washington). Amazon have released a prospectus seeking cities/regions to pitch for this business which will involve some 50,000 jobs, 8 million square feet of space and an investment by Amazon of $USD 5 Billion. Not hard to understand that this move has created a bidding frenzy, particularly from cities and regions hard hit by the manufacturing exodus over the past few years in North America. At one of the best social functions of the conference, some 200 economic development stars and guests from around the world loved the ‘International Dinner’. I was lucky enough to draw a seat beside the Head of Policy from the Falkland Islands. It was fascinating to hear about some of the aspirations and challenges facing the Falklands, but it also put a whole new perspective on ‘remote’. Earlier in 2017, submission of an abstract to one of the conference themes resulted in an invitation to present at the conference. My topic was ‘Reconciling Objectives of Land Use Planners and Economic Developers’. As background to my presentation I undertook a short survey of town planners in my network to uncover the ‘Top 5 Gripes of Land Use Planners’ in dealing with development applications. Likewise I surveyed economic development professionals and members of the development industry to understand their top 5 gripes of the planning process. Having worked in regional and metropolitan areas, with responsibilities for land use planning and also economic development, I have developed a strong view that economic developers can play a critical role when they are alongside planners (both statutory and strategic) in a supportive sense, rather than as an advocate for a proponent or investor. My survey showed however, that these myths about the planning process by all parties, are heavily ingrained and new ways of engagement are needed. I suggest a practical approach for economic developers. VOL.11 NO.1 2018 | 24