EB5 Investors Magazine Volume 7, Issue 2 | Page 47

TOP IMMIGRATION AT TORNEYS DANIEL B. LUNDY KLASKO IMMIGRATION LAW PARTNERS, LLP Daniel Lundy is a par tner with Klasko Immigration Law Partners LLP, heading its EB-5 d eve l o p e r/r e g i o n a l c e n te r practice and litigation practice. Lundy represents developers and regional centers who seek to raise money through EB-5. Lundy represents many clients in troubled EB-5 projects, including matters involving SEC complaints and allegations of fraud or misappropriation, where he helps to preserve the immigration interests of investors throughout the restructuring of those projects. Lundy has extensive experience litigating immigration cases in the federal courts and is frequently retained to help with RFEs, NOIDs and appeals of USCIS denials. He received his Juris Doctor from Fordham University. WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS ON THE EB-5 MODERNIZATION CHANGES THAT TOOK EFFECT IN 2019 WITH THE INCREASED INVESTMENT AMOUNTS? The increased investment amount and restrictions on TEAs will drive EB-5 projects smaller and out of major metropolitan areas. Because it will take longer to raise money at the increased investment level, very large EB-5 capital raises will become rare. We will see more projects where the investors are the developers, or the developers bring their own investors. WHAT NEW TRENDS ARE YOU SEEING IN THE EB-5 INDUSTRY? EB-5 processing times have slowed substantially, resulting in many mandamus lawsuits being filed to compel USCIS to adjudicate petitions. Denial rates seem to be on the rise, so lawsuits challenging denials will become common. We are likely to see the resolution of some of the bigger fraud cases in the near future. RFEs and NOIDs are becoming more common, and investors will have to work harder to file strong petitions. While EB-5 has never been simple or easy, it is likely to increase in complexity in the near future. Disputes over redeployment are also likely to become more prevalent. BRANDON MEYER MEYER LAW GROUP Brandon Meyer is the founder and managing par tner of M e y e r L a w G r o u p ( M L G) , w h e r e h e p r ov i d e s q u a li t y legal representation to clients ranging from EB-5 regional center operators and individual investors to multinational corporations. Involved in EB-5 since 1998, Meyer has seen the multiple life cycles of the EB-5 program. Meyer received his law degree from the University of San Diego School of Law and is a member of the Bars of Connecticut and the District of Columbia. MLG is headquartered in San Francisco and has offices in Los Angeles, San Diego and Vietnam. WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS ON THE EB-5 MODERNIZATION CHANGES THAT TOOK EFFECT IN 2019 WITH THE INCREASED INVESTMENT AMOUNTS? After 28 years at the $500,000 level, it was inevitable that the minimum investment amount would increase. The EB-5 industry has yet to come to grips with this reality and is holding itself back in the process. Nine hundred thousand dollars is still far less than many other competing programs, none of which can offer the benefits of U.S. permanent residency. The world is still full of $900,000 investors wishing to move to the U.S. The “modernization” that has the greater and more negative impact is the change in targeted employment area designation. The EB-5 industry will struggle under these new rules. WHAT NEW TRENDS ARE YOU SEEING IN THE EB-5 INDUSTRY? Once quota backlogs hit mainland China, then Vietnam, wholesale EB-5 investor sourcing came to an end. The industry has yet to fully come to grips with this fact. The investor market is now more diffuse worldwide and domestically, but the old mindset of “I remember the days when 20 people would sign up at the end of the seminar” still persists. This five-year bubble grossly distorted the EB-5 market and led to conditions that created questionable industry practices. The end of the China market coupled with EB-5 program “modernization” gives the industry an opportunity to rightsize itself and clean up some of the emerging mess from the bubble years. EB5INVESTORS.COM 47